I don't get it. So, they would not look at the Pentagon Papers or other evidence of crimes that have been suppressed?
It seems to me that the important thing is the information, not the source. Or am I just ill-informed with regards to journalism and ethics? I get the fruit of a poisoned tree thing for government prosecutions. But, won't this type of standard make it easier to suppress whistle-blower information pointing out government malfeasance? https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?e=cnJiQGcuY2xlbXNvbi5lZHU%3D&s=5cc6e448fe1ff6510311c476 -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
