Indeed, this development is just wishful thinking and doubles-down on false 
narratives in order to benefit one party. It reeks of desperation. Where does 
one even start? Most of the underlying assumptions the DNC "true believers" are 
committed to are just plain false, and they have to know it. The trope of 
"Russian interference" which is totally  unsupported, other than CIA hearsay 
(always a great reliable source). The trope of "hacked" documents, when the 
damning DNC emails were shown by former NSA chief scientist Bill Binney to have 
been transferred to a flash drive and not hacked. 
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

The hacking narrative (or "lie") is another escape hatch to avoid real 
culpability and internal responsibility,. It is anti-ethical because they want 
to poison-pill the truth which they demand be hidden. The pledge to "not use" 
when of course, the evidence is damning to their core party members and they 
are afraid it could be used against them. 

Does anyone read independent news media anymore or are real journalists such as 
Robert Parry (now conveniently deceased), Seymour Hersh, Glenn Greenwald, 
Caitlin Johnstone, Robert Fisk, Eve Bartlett, Chris Hedges?   They are not even 
included as op-eds anymore in the establishment-prostrating corporate media 
which continue to hold adherents, against all the evidence showing them to be 
our Pravdas?

Peter Jones

PETER JONES, PH.D.
OCAD UNIVERSITY
http://designdialogues.com
http://slab.ocadu.ca







-----Original Message-----
From: LT <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Richard Brooks
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [liberationtech] Democrats rally around pledge not to use hacked 
documents (Wash Post)

I don't get it. So, they would not look at the Pentagon Papers or other 
evidence of crimes that have been suppressed?

It seems to me that the important thing is the information, not the source. Or 
am I just ill-informed with regards to journalism and ethics?

I get the fruit of a poisoned tree thing for government prosecutions. But, 
won't this type of standard make it easier to suppress whistle-blower 
information pointing out government malfeasance?

https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?e=cnJiQGcuY2xlbXNvbi5lZHU%3D&s=5cc6e448fe1ff6510311c476

--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].


-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].

Reply via email to