Hi Doug (Sawsan) - Thanks for these follow-ups. I am perhaps too sensitized 
from years of frustrating advocacy in peace activism. There’s so little 
progress over decades. Sawsan, thanks for the note – I had misread the 
critiques of Snopes perhaps, I didn't mean to argue as much as to redirect the 
discussion back to the problematic astroturfing Bellingcat. Now if some don’t 
mind, I’ll redirect myself, not to argue but to fill you in a bit. (Others can 
ignore this personal story.)

 

World beyond War is actually a newer organization, started in 2014 by veteran 
online activist David Swanson and some serious thinkers, including former US 
Navy officer Leah Bolger. Their Global Security System is a real systems 
science approach to the complexity of today’s hybrid warfare. My own research 
agenda is in how to disrupt and displace this $2T world-level business model of 
militarization. The US DoD is also the world’s largest user of fossil fuels and 
the  single largest organization contributing to climate impact. This is an 
issue few people in the climate movement are even aware of. 

 

WBW has moved from US to international in an evolutionary way, by holding live 
conferences in the different major cities where ant-war activist are wiling to 
host them. Because they are an “all-embracing” organization they have become 
the peace org that has the intellectual integrity to embrace the other peace 
movements.  

 

I hosted their 2018 conference at OCAD University here in Toronto. We need arts 
and design for activism, or we don’t engage people in the culture. I had 
contacted David when he was looking to host the 2018 event in Toronto. It was 
their biggest conference ever, we had Medea Benjamin do a book signing for her 
Iran book, Yves Engler, and great indigenous speakers, etc. The Canadian peace 
movement was galvanized and have been holding meta-meetings across about a 
dozen groups ever since WBW invested some assistance. (They even hired a part 
time Canadian coordinator – we are actively fighting Trudeau’s $19B fighter jet 
buy, we have specific issues).

 

So Doug, I know you from the Participatory Design community, and I guess my 
last PDC was 2008. I took a lot of that learning into the 
http://RSDSymposium.org  I was in the US until emigrating to Canada to protest 
the continuation of the Iraq War- we have been settled in Toronto since 2006. 

 

And I’m not against working with the military directly to enable their 
transition into peace-supporting security organization. They are perhaps the 
least corrupt of the organizations involved in the MMIC complex. They will have 
a future, there is a huge role for a military without wars, even if the 
business model that invents threats to generate the $2T dissipates. 

 

Sorry to go on long here, but this stories why I’m passionate about 
truth-finding, as information warfare is a major part of hybrid war (fourth 
generation warfare) and this is the battlefield in which we are all on every 
day.

 

Happy New year, and kind regards, Peter

PETER JONES, PH.D.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
FACULTY OF DESIGN

T   <tel:416%20799%208799> 416 799.8799      @redesign
E   <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <http://designdialogues.com/> Design Dialogues          
 <http://slab.ocadu.ca/> Strategic Innovation Lab
 <https://systemic-design.net/> Systemic Design Association (RSD) 

OCAD UNIVERSITY
Strategic Foresight & Innovation
205 Richmond St. West, Suite 410
Toronto, Canada  M5V 1V3

 

 

 

 

 

From: Doug Schuler <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, January 1, 2021 9:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Domestic Caverns <[email protected]>; Richard Brooks 
<[email protected]>; LT <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Intentional Big Tech Leftist Bias in Social and 
News Media Corrupts Elections and Defrauds Peoples

 

 

Peter --- It's quite possible that I weigh in in the future on this but for now 
don't quit the list because of my ignorance! 

 

I actually try to some degree to understand a bit of what's actually going on. 
It's not easy. I also hope that well-meaning people with lack of knowledge can 
participate in these discussions. I prefer people holding that role to true 
believers, professional dissemblers,  and super spreaders.

 

I'm opposed to much of US foreign policy and I obviously am way in the dark on 
a large percentage of it. My sense is, however, that the US is not the only 
"bad guy" out there. In fact I'd like to think that the US can be something of 
a "good guy" on occasion. 

 

I'll look into the beyond war perspective. Is this the same group that was 
active in the 80's (or thereabouts)?

 

— Doug

 

 

On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 4:53 PM Peter Jones | Redesign 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

You are seriously citing “Snopes” in a list that purports to engage scholarship 
into serious surveillance, security technology or (in this case) foreign policy 
issues? 

 

Perhaps you didn’t look at any of the references I cited. The most significant 
issue with Bellingcat is that they are funded and sponsored by  a NATO 
advisory. It is their job to disinform. That is how wars are promoted when you 
are the aggressor.

 

Higgins has been caught outright lying about his relationship with the FCO and 
government funding by Hitchens and others on Twitter. These are not arguments, 
they are misrepresentations. 

 

The critical issue here is the cover-up. The lead OPCW field chemist who led 
the fact-finding mission for the Douma Syria report verified that there was no 
indication of a chorine “chemical weapons” attack on the purported site. There 
were two dozen children’s bodies placed in the basement, that were claimed as 
victims, but they did not die of chlorine. There was no chlorine beyond the 
level found in normal household use. 

 

But the field investigation team’s unanimous findings were deliberately 
misreported by the OPCW by their (Bush appointed) Dir General, who publicly 
claimed there was a confirmed chorine release. Which is not revealed by the 
field findings. That is the real political scandal. 

 

The filed team did not state that the filmed scene was staged – that’s outside 
the purview of OPCW. But that is also the subject of Patrick Watson’s analysis 
BTW. Read some of the painstaking analysis and you will see why this is 
suppressed, and why I think very poorly of “Snopes” who is enabling (our) war 
crimes here. 

 

Snopes is also partisan and unreliable in a media ecology that is now 
hopelessly divided and divisive. Its as much of an establishment tool as exists 
in the US/UK universe of bought-reporting. 

 

If this level of insight on the list persists - I’ll just going to quit the 
list. I don’t have the time to waste on “liberation tech” that finds favour 
with the MIC/NATO establishment and its media trolls and is uninterested in 
learning from actual citizen-led independent investigations. And that are in 
apparent uncritical support of the $2 trillion / year US/NATO war system that 
uses mercenary “terrorists” to create events that justify its attacks and 
regime change programs. Who did you think is paying for the surveillance 
systems that this list was set up to intervene? Its all the same Five Eyes.

 

I recommend to those interested in our new approach to the peace movement, to 
find the report on Global Security System at World Beyond War 
https://worldbeyondwar.org/alternative/ 

 

Wishing everyone peace in your own communities in the New Year.

 

Peter

 

From: LT <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Intentional Big Tech Leftist Bias in Social and 
News Media Corrupts Elections and Defrauds Peoples

 

Thanks Tom.

 

That seems to clear up some things.

 

— Doug

 

 

 

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 5:17 PM Domestic Caverns <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi Peter, 

 

I’m not sure if this is what you’re referring to regarding the white helmets, 
but here is some fact checking on them as a hoax:

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is-this-proof-white-helmets-staged-chemical-attack/

 

Best,

Tom

 

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:45 PM Peter Jones | Redesign 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi Richard - Its interesting you'd suggest Bellingcat on this list (Liberation 
Tech) as an exemplar for investigative techniques that purport to identity 
motive and source. In my observation of their work, they have the resources to 
conduct very  sophisticated study - because that are a dedicated insider info 
ops (hybrid warfare) group of the NATO-sponsored Atlantic Council - their DFRL 
organization https://www.digitalsherlocks.org 

 

Bellingcat started up two days before the infamous MH17 airliner shootdown in 
Ukraine 7.17.2014 (a problematic case that is still definitely unresolved in 
the Dutch special court). They immediately entangled themselves in evidence 
production from the "fog of war" among the various actual investigators on the 
ground. Their notoriety and founding were started up in sync with this event, 
which would give them interesting context for their own motives. 

 

The  founders Higgins and Toler are senior fellows at the NATO DFRLab 
https://www.digitalsherlocks.org/360-os-2018  which verifies not necessarily a 
guarantee of income, but at least the level of establishment of their primary 
client. I’d suspect they aren’t hurting for a job. 

 

The goals of the DRFL program are ostensibly to "counter disinformation." But 
the explicit means of doing so are to construct preferred information that is 
certified by their vast network of the military complex that requires such 
"bottom up"  narratives to justify their own interventions and weaponization of 
social media. After all Obama shelled out  $250M in his last gift to the Mil 
Complex December 2016. Also for “countering (primarily Russian) disinformation” 
 which is a neat way of saying “creating disinformation for the public.” All US 
wars have been started and justified by such information ops long before 
kinetic  actions, and this was done with newspapers before electronic media.  

 

Put your McLuhanist hats on. Who has the most to gain from these operations? 
Who has skin in the game and who is paying for these investigations? Who is 
working at their OWN risk and conscience to develop and expose (or whistleblow) 
truthful reporting? 

 

The anti-Bellingcats are actual citizen sleuths  such as Northern Ireland’ 
Patrick Watson, who was disgusted by what he saw as obvious fake videos with 
the White Helmets, used to promote the Syrian “chemical weapons” videos.  He 
did hos own research and blew open quiet a bit of trouble. 

 

His website https://hiddensyria.com/ covers a number of his investigations – 
he’s clearly not a “Russian” anything, as I’ve followed his work from  the very 
first tweet I think (I happened to see his easily outbursts) AND he doesn’t’ 
have a lot of followers. A troll tries  to sensationalize and get a lot of 
attention. Philip has also worked hard, and at risk, to show the OPCW 
organization is at fault for covering up their field evidence that exonerates 
the Syrian government, a very inconvenient finding. There are whistle-blower 
memos and support from the founding OPCW General  Director for their exposure. 
It’s a significant scandal, and on this issue Bellingcat is arguing (and was 
caught fabricating) for the establishment, again, and every time, for the wars. 

 

I would also confirm  regard for the small UK academic team, the  Working Group 
on Syria, Propaganda and Media that has done open sources and deep 
investigative reporting on the  Syrian hoaxes and White Helmets (along with 
Vanessa Bealey's fieldwork). 

 

has also been heavily attacked by mainstream reporters, (Guardian types) and 
77th Brigade (the British military info ops soldiers) 
https://syriapropagandamedia.org/  Because they have been on-0tagert, the BBC 
and Guardian have smeared their work on front page stories to try to recover 
their Syrian war “information superiority.” In the shadowy world of information 
ops, this is a war on real people. And the establishment will lose, over time, 
regardless of how many more millions they throw at 77th Brigades and projects 
like the UK’s FCO-sponsored Integrity Initiative 
https://syriapropagandamedia.org/the-integrity-initiative 

 

Humans with a conscience will always eventually win on social media, as the war 
narrative is always a drumbeat of the same talking points and arguments. 
Reality is complex, ambiguous, and subject to surprises – which is what we see 
in the citizen reporter stories.

 

As a professor I would at least present students with case studies from “both 
sides.”

 

To a more peaceful 2021,  Peter Jones

 

PETER JONES, PH.D.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
FACULTY OF DESIGN

T   <tel:416%20799%208799> 416 799.8799      @redesign
E   <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <http://designdialogues.com/> Design Dialogues          
 <http://slab.ocadu.ca/> Strategic Innovation Lab
 <https://systemic-design.net/> Systemic Design Association (RSD) 

OCAD UNIVERSITY
Strategic Foresight & Innovation
205 Richmond St. West, Suite 410 
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/205+Richmond+St.+West,+Suite+410+Toronto,+Canada++M5V+1V3?entry=gmail&source=g>
 
Toronto, Canada  
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/205+Richmond+St.+West,+Suite+410+Toronto,+Canada++M5V+1V3?entry=gmail&source=g>
  M5V 1V3 
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/205+Richmond+St.+West,+Suite+410+Toronto,+Canada++M5V+1V3?entry=gmail&source=g>
 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: LT <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Richard Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:39 PM
To: Doug Schuler <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >; Richard Brooks <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: LT <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Intentional Big Tech Leftist Bias in Social and 
News Media Corrupts Elections and Defrauds Peoples

 

The idea of thoughts and ideas being similar to a biological ecosystem has been 
around for a while. I think that Richard Dawkins, William S. Burroughs, and 
Robert Anton Wilson all have legitimate claims to having originated the idea. 
(It is likely to have roots in antiquity somewhere.)

 

The US does have a certain anti-intellectualism deep in its subconscious and at 
least one (nameless) political party has worked hard to delegitimize science 
(evolution, economics, climate change, ...).

 

That this would lead eventually to people being susceptible to having their 
innate biases exploited by other actors, is not surprising.

 

Social media has exacerbated the process.

 

One idea that I have been playing with is trying to introduce somewhere in 
curricula having students use tools/techniques like those used by Bellingcat to 
determine the source and motivation of online campaigns.

 

I really am impressed by Bellingcat.

 

On 12/30/20 2:12 PM, Doug Schuler wrote:

> An article in the recent Science magazine talked about a “syndemic” 

> which

> 

> "is the intersection of two epidemics—two diseases ravaging a 

> population at the same time, exacerbating each other. HIV weakens the 

> immune system, for instance, which makes people more likely to develop 

> tuberculosis. The world witnessed some- thing similar this year. We 

> live in an eco-system that allows viruses to cross from wildlife to 

> humans more often and spread farther and faster than ever before—that 

> gave us SARS-CoV-2. But the virus emerged in an information ecosystem 

> that helps misinformation and lies spread faster than scientific 

> evidence, weakening our ability to respond to new threats. That made 

> the pandemic far worse."

> 

>  <https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/370/6523/1395.full.pdf> 
> https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/370/6523/1395.full.pdf

> 

> Without necessarily buying into the entire metaphor it seems pretty 

> useful, bringing up concepts susceptibility, vulnerable populations, 

> super spreaders, mode of transmission, and, of course, inoculation.

> 

> It also fits well into my investigations into civic intelligence which 

> I believe is threatened like other natural resources. And if it gets 

> too low, our ability to address our problems cooperatively becomes 

> ever more helpless.

> 

> I'd love to hear your thoughts on this!

> 

> — Doug

> 

> 

> 

> 

> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 8:49 AM Richard Brooks <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>  

> < <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> 

>     Interesting.

> 

>     

>  <https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/2/21278601/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-tr> 
> https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/2/21278601/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-tr

> ump-posts-employee-call-fact-checking-voter-misinformation

> 

>      <https://faculty.lsu.edu/fakenews/elections/thethreatofqanon.php> 
> https://faculty.lsu.edu/fakenews/elections/thethreatofqanon.php

> 

>     

>  <https://www.france24.com/en/20201006-qanon-conspiracies-go-global-in-p> 
> https://www.france24.com/en/20201006-qanon-conspiracies-go-global-in-p

> andemic-perfect-storm

> 

>     

>  <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334?jour> 
> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334?jour

> nalCode=rics20

> 

>     

>  <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtube-radi> 
> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtube-radi

> cal.html

> 

>     On 12/23/20 4:31 AM, grarpamp wrote:

>     > The Invisible Influence of Big Tech on Politics & Elections - Allum

>     > Bokhari #Deleted

>     >  <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFJfGphZBmQ> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFJfGphZBmQ

>     > #Deleted: Big Tech's battle to erase the trump movement and steal

>     the election

>     >  <https://deletedbook.com/> https://deletedbook.com/

>     >

> 

> 

 

--

Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:  
<https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt> 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing  
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected].

-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .




 

-- 

Douglas Schuler

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Twitter: @doug_schuler

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Sphere Project

      <http://www.publicsphereproject.org/> http://www.publicsphereproject.org/

 

Mailing list ~ Collective Intelligence for the Common Good

       <http://lists.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci> 
http://lists.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci4cg-announce

    

Creating the World Citizen Parliament

      
<http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament>
 
http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament

     

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (project) 

      <http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/> 
http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/lv

 

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book)      
   

https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/liberating-voices




 

-- 

Douglas Schuler

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Twitter: @doug_schuler

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Sphere Project

      <http://www.publicsphereproject.org/> http://www.publicsphereproject.org/

 

Mailing list ~ Collective Intelligence for the Common Good

       <http://lists.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci> 
http://lists.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci4cg-announce

    

Creating the World Citizen Parliament

      
<http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament>
 
http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament

     

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (project) 

      <http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/> 
http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/lv

 

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book)      
   

https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/liberating-voices

-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].

Reply via email to