https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376454/
https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf Do you have any concerns with those studies and the results?I also don't understand the last part; if RF exposure does have adverse health effects, what exactly is the net win, and for whom?
Marc On 2/28/21 3:55 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mar 1, 2021, at 12:36 AM, Greg <[email protected]> wrote: This letter signed by some 300k+ peopleSignatures =/= science.includes links to studies showing supposed adverse health effects.Straw man. The question isn’t whether RF exposure has adverse health effects, the question is whether reducing that exposure is a net win or a net loss. Those who are not innumerate tend to go for the “net win” side of that equation. -Bill
-- GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
OpenPGP_0x39B850B3CB16235E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
