This article has a diagram of where 5g is in the electromagnetic spectrum (along with some of the reasons why the general consensus is that that's safe): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html
-Sam On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:34 AM 3gg <[email protected]> wrote: > That makes sense, thank you. What isn't yet very clear to me is the > absolute scale of things. Where on that radiation scale would a > deployment of 5g lie at, what magnitudes are considered harmful by > recent research, and who backed that research? > > I cannot navigate these papers without getting lost, but hopefully you > can share your insights. > > Thank you, > > Marc > > On 2/28/21 4:52 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > >> On Mar 1, 2021, at 1:40 AM, 3gg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In your last statement, are you saying the health risk is acceptable > because you get to at least use your phone? > > No. This isn’t about acceptable or not acceptable. That’s subjective, > and different for different people. > > > > This is just about “more” or “less.” > > > > -Bill > > > -- > GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E > > https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/ > > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major > commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you > moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, > change to digest mode, or change password by emailing > [email protected]. >
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
