On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:11 -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2007 11:28:08 Subrata Modak wrote: > But my question is, do we really need to have a parser to geneate kind of a > HTML file? I guess that the normal text file is already enough.
Yes, the information contained in the text file is enough, but may not be that representable/viewable. What we can do is present the same info in more better/attractive way. May be if we can show things in HTML (and tabular format), with all the failed tests sorted out and appearing in the beginning (with some back ground colour highlighting), the user immediately gets attention of all the failed tests along with the reason(s). Won´t that be a little pretty ?? May be all of you can decide upon this !! > > >3) Ricardoś patch (applied earlier) to provide the name of Failed file > >(containing the tag name and cmdline entries of failed test-cases) does > I didn't want to add the error info at the same file so we could easily ask > LTP to run only the failed test cases. As we already have all the output at > another file, I don't think that we should modify how we're creating this > file. Yes, let us keep it as it is. > > I guess that what we have at the output file is enough to see what's > happening, like: > <<<test_start>>> > tag=gf17 stime=1189631960 > cmdline="growfiles -W gf17 -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 5000 -T 100 -t > 499990 -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf03_" > contacts="" > analysis=exit > initiation_status="ok" > <<<test_output>>> > gf17 1 PASS : Test passed > <<<execution_status>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
