Thanks Carmelo, I will go through it. Others can also comment/endorse on Carmeloś format or you can go ahead to suggest your own.
--Subrata-- On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:04 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 09:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > > >> Subrata Modak wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 08:35 -0400, Mike Melendez wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Hi All, > >> I vote for having simply the output in XML format (plus usual text file > >> as already confirmed by Subrata). > >> From XML we can do a lot of things... using a XSL stylesheet to show > >> result on a web page, > >> using a XML transformer (C, java, whatever) to generate other output, > >> importing the log easily > >> on a spreadsheet and so on. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Carmelo > >> > > > > Thanks Carmelo, > > Can you also post a sample XML file that you would expect the Parser to > > generate (from the Text file) (say the XML file contains the > > highlighting and other features that i mentioned below ) ?? > > > > --Subrata-- > > > Hi Subrata, > attached you can find a skeleton of an XML document, based on a real log. > A usefull section I'd like to add is the <statistics> showing the > overall results of the tests. > The other sections are essentially a translation of the text into xml > tags, removing some other > output from /proc/cpuinfo for example. > It's just an example. > Another suggestion is to define a DTD or better an XML schema to be sure > the output > is well-formed. > > Ciao, > Carmelo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
