On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:34 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:49 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > I think the natural place for including these tests is the 
> > testcases/network/rpc branch.
> > 
> > Do you want me to send a patch from the last ltp realease that includes 
> > them in the right place ?
> 
> Yes. That would be great. Please pick up the latest LTP from:
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp-full-20071130.tgz?download,

Do you have any updates for me on this ??

--Subrata
> 
> And i would also like to propose the following points:
> 1) You should know the way LTP-Network Tests are run. There are some
> inherent variables set and other environmental settings done both at the
> Client as well as the Server Side before these tests are executed. So,
> your patch (new test cases addition for RPC and TRIPC) should be able to
> adhere to all those norms. User should be able to execute your test
> cases automatically when they run LTP-Network tests,
> 2) You should also properly document what your test cases are all about,
> how they can be built, installed and executed and how their results
> should be parsed in a Proper README file in any of the sub-directories
> that your patch is going to create under ltp/testcases/network/rpc.
> 3) Include Copyright and GPLv2 definition at the beginning of each of
> your new Test cases for License conformance in LTP,
> 4) Last and not the least, please respond to somebody if they find
> problem(s) in executing your testcases by providing fixes, patches, etc
> on the mailing-list.
> 
> Expecting a patch from you on this and much more contribution to LTP in
> future. Good luck.
> 
> --Subrata
> 
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Aurélien
> > 
> > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > 
> > >***********************
> > >Warning: Your file, rpc-test-suite.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files 
> > >after decompression and cannot be scanned.
> > >***********************
> > >
> > >
> > >Well i am waiting for reply to the proposals that i made below. Is it
> > >possible for you to submit a Patch on the lines other Network Tests in
> > >general and NFS tests in Particular, that are written in LTP.
> > >
> > >I would also like to know more about the prospect of including the
> > >attached test suite inside LTP from the community. What do you feel
> > >about including the same in LTP after some tweaking ??
> > >
> > >--Subrata
> > >
> > >On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 15:11 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > >  
> > >
> > >>On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 08:51 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped by our NFSv4 
> > >>>team.
> > >>>I sent a message with code as attachment to the ltp-list, because it 
> > >>>would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP testsuite.
> > >>>
> > >>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code.
> > >>>
> > >>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test 
> > >>>harness API to be included in the project ?
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks you in advance for advice.
> > >>>
> > >>>Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>>Aurélien
> > >>>
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>I had replied to you earlier on this. May be the mail has not reached
> > >>you. I will paste my Reply below to the same mail you sent earlier:
> > >>
> > >>Aurélien Charbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/30/2007
> > >>07:50:02 PM:
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped in our NFSv4
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>team.
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>I sent a message with the code as attachment to the ltp-list, because
> > >>>it would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP
> > >>>testsuite.
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>Thank you. I received it long back. Yes it would be great to have any
> > >>sort of Value addition to LTP. We welcome you to give us any nonexistent
> > >>test cases to LTP. 
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code.
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>Sorry for that.
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test
> > >>>harness API to be included in the project ?
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>May not be always. It depends on the type of Test Cases that we are
> > >>trying to Integrate to LTP. For example, KDUMP is executed Exclusively
> > >>and does not run with runltp script. So it is not a problem if it
> > >>reports results in itś own format, but, the same is not with NUMA. So, i
> > >>got the NUMA guy to write it in Ltp TEST HARNESS API. So, it depends
> > >>upon the type of Integration. I think the Network testcases in LTP does
> > >>not follow the LTP API as again Network Test Cases are run separately in
> > >>most instances. Having said that, i would like to see your test cases in
> > >>the form of some new subdirectory under ltp/testcases/network. There are
> > >>already nfs and nfsv4 test cases existing. Please go through them and
> > >>see whether the functionality they cover are also covered by your test
> > >>cases, then in such a case there will be just the duplication of same
> > >>functionality testing. Can you please come up with an idea to find out
> > >>the exact place where we can comfortably put your test cases in LTP ??
> > >>And then submit a Patch in this regard. I would be more than happy to
> > >>see your test cases in LTP. I am attaching the same once again for
> > >>everybody to review. Let us come up with an IDEA to include Charbonś
> > >>contribution in LTP.
> > >>
> > >>--Subrata--
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to