On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:19 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:34 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:49 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > > I think the natural place for including these tests is the 
> > > testcases/network/rpc branch.
> > > 
> > > Do you want me to send a patch from the last ltp realease that includes 
> > > them in the right place ?
> > 
> > Yes. That would be great. Please pick up the latest LTP from:
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp-full-20071130.tgz?download,
> 
> Do you have any updates for me on this ??

Are you ready with your Patch ?

--Subrata
> 
> --Subrata
> > 
> > And i would also like to propose the following points:
> > 1) You should know the way LTP-Network Tests are run. There are some
> > inherent variables set and other environmental settings done both at the
> > Client as well as the Server Side before these tests are executed. So,
> > your patch (new test cases addition for RPC and TRIPC) should be able to
> > adhere to all those norms. User should be able to execute your test
> > cases automatically when they run LTP-Network tests,
> > 2) You should also properly document what your test cases are all about,
> > how they can be built, installed and executed and how their results
> > should be parsed in a Proper README file in any of the sub-directories
> > that your patch is going to create under ltp/testcases/network/rpc.
> > 3) Include Copyright and GPLv2 definition at the beginning of each of
> > your new Test cases for License conformance in LTP,
> > 4) Last and not the least, please respond to somebody if they find
> > problem(s) in executing your testcases by providing fixes, patches, etc
> > on the mailing-list.
> > 
> > Expecting a patch from you on this and much more contribution to LTP in
> > future. Good luck.
> > 
> > --Subrata
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Aurélien
> > > 
> > > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > 
> > > >***********************
> > > >Warning: Your file, rpc-test-suite.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files 
> > > >after decompression and cannot be scanned.
> > > >***********************
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Well i am waiting for reply to the proposals that i made below. Is it
> > > >possible for you to submit a Patch on the lines other Network Tests in
> > > >general and NFS tests in Particular, that are written in LTP.
> > > >
> > > >I would also like to know more about the prospect of including the
> > > >attached test suite inside LTP from the community. What do you feel
> > > >about including the same in LTP after some tweaking ??
> > > >
> > > >--Subrata
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 15:11 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >>On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 08:51 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >>>Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped by our NFSv4 
> > > >>>team.
> > > >>>I sent a message with code as attachment to the ltp-list, because it 
> > > >>>would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP 
> > > >>>testsuite.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test 
> > > >>>harness API to be included in the project ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Thanks you in advance for advice.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Best regards,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Aurélien
> > > >>>
> > > >>>      
> > > >>>
> > > >>I had replied to you earlier on this. May be the mail has not reached
> > > >>you. I will paste my Reply below to the same mail you sent earlier:
> > > >>
> > > >>Aurélien Charbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/30/2007
> > > >>07:50:02 PM:
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >>>Hi,
> > > >>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped in our NFSv4
> > > >>>      
> > > >>>
> > > >>team.
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >>>I sent a message with the code as attachment to the ltp-list, because
> > > >>>it would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP
> > > >>>testsuite.
> > > >>>      
> > > >>>
> > > >>Thank you. I received it long back. Yes it would be great to have any
> > > >>sort of Value addition to LTP. We welcome you to give us any nonexistent
> > > >>test cases to LTP. 
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code.
> > > >>>      
> > > >>>
> > > >>Sorry for that.
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test
> > > >>>harness API to be included in the project ?
> > > >>>      
> > > >>>
> > > >>May not be always. It depends on the type of Test Cases that we are
> > > >>trying to Integrate to LTP. For example, KDUMP is executed Exclusively
> > > >>and does not run with runltp script. So it is not a problem if it
> > > >>reports results in itś own format, but, the same is not with NUMA. So, i
> > > >>got the NUMA guy to write it in Ltp TEST HARNESS API. So, it depends
> > > >>upon the type of Integration. I think the Network testcases in LTP does
> > > >>not follow the LTP API as again Network Test Cases are run separately in
> > > >>most instances. Having said that, i would like to see your test cases in
> > > >>the form of some new subdirectory under ltp/testcases/network. There are
> > > >>already nfs and nfsv4 test cases existing. Please go through them and
> > > >>see whether the functionality they cover are also covered by your test
> > > >>cases, then in such a case there will be just the duplication of same
> > > >>functionality testing. Can you please come up with an idea to find out
> > > >>the exact place where we can comfortably put your test cases in LTP ??
> > > >>And then submit a Patch in this regard. I would be more than happy to
> > > >>see your test cases in LTP. I am attaching the same once again for
> > > >>everybody to review. Let us come up with an IDEA to include Charbonś
> > > >>contribution in LTP.
> > > >>
> > > >>--Subrata--
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> > It's the best place to buy or sell services
> > for just about anything Open Source.
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltp-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to