> Thanks Xugang-san. Naresh/Yamato, you can proceed with your porting, as > issues seems to be resolved now.
Naresh-san, sorry making you wait on. Now we can go ahead. I've read your original message. However, I don't know why it is failed. but, I think we can inspect the reason after porting it to LTP. I don't want to the original test case of crackerjack because is uses the raw number of system calls. It may assume i386. However, my primary PC is x86_64. I cannot run the test case directly on my PC. One more. Could you report the kernel version (and distro) you are using. Currently we don't have any proof it is *NOT* kernel bug. Masatake YAMATO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
