Thanks for reply Yamato,
I will investigate those issues and modify those test cases to support all
architectures.
I'll come back to you shortly.
Thanks & regard
Naresh Kamboju
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Xugang-san. Naresh/Yamato, you can proceed with your porting, as
> > issues seems to be resolved now.
>
> Naresh-san, sorry making you wait on.
> Now we can go ahead.
>
> I've read your original message.
> However, I don't know why it is failed.
> but, I think we can inspect the reason after porting it
> to LTP. I don't want to the original test case of crackerjack
> because is uses the raw number of system calls. It may assume
> i386. However, my primary PC is x86_64. I cannot run the test
> case directly on my PC.
>
> One more. Could you report the kernel version (and distro)
> you are using.
>
> Currently we don't have any proof it is *NOT* kernel bug.
>
>
> Masatake YAMATO
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
