On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 22:51 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 09:26 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> >> > Also, if you guys can try out this patch for refpolicy/Makefile, I'd
> >> >> > prefer to check it in (it unifies the RHEL 4.x and `generic' refpolicy
> >> >> > Make logic):
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Index: refpolicy/Makefile
> >> >> > ===================================================================
> >> >> > RCS file: 
> >> >> > /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy/Makefile,v
> >> >> > retrieving revision 1.12
> >> >> > diff -u -r1.12 Makefile
> >> >> > --- refpolicy/Makefile  8 Jan 2010 09:39:20 -0000       1.12
> >> >> > +++ refpolicy/Makefile  12 Jan 2010 17:17:27 -0000
> >> >> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> >> >> >  #    with this program; if not, write to the Free Software 
> >> >> > Foundation, Inc.,
> >> >> >  #    51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> >> >> >  #
> >> >> > -# Garrett Cooper, August 2009
> >> >> > +# Garrett Cooper, January 2010
> >> >> >  #
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  top_srcdir             ?= ../../../../..
> >> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  DISTRO_VER             := $(shell 
> >> >> > $(top_srcdir)/scripts/detect_distro.sh $(ARGS))
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +# Avoid empty strings.
> >> >> >  ifeq ($(strip $(DISTRO_VER)),)
> >> >> >  DISTRO_VER             := generic
> >> >> >  endif
> >> >> > @@ -41,10 +42,17 @@
> >> >> >  POLICY_DEVEL_DIR       ?= $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/selinux/devel
> >> >> >  SEMODULE               ?= $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/semodule
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -INSTALL_DIR            := testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite
> >> >> > +INSTALL_DIR            := testcases/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  TEST_POLICY_DIR                := $(abs_srcdir)/policy_files
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +# Do we have a special set of policies in the SCM to install?
> >> >> > +ifneq ($(wildcard $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/$(DISTRO_VER)/),)
> >> >> > +TEST_POLICY_DIR                := $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/$(DISTRO_VER)
> >> >> > +else
> >> >> > +TEST_POLICY_DIR                := $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/generic
> >> >> > +endif
> >> >> > +
> >> >> >  .PHONY: all clean cleanup install load
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  CLEAN_DEPS             := cleanup
> >> >> > @@ -55,34 +63,24 @@
> >> >> >        -$(SEMODULE) -r test_policy
> >> >> >        $(RM) -f $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR)/test_policy.* test_policy.te
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -ifneq ($(wildcard $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/$(DISTRO_VER)/Makefile),)
> >> >> > -MAKE_TARGETS           :=
> >> >> > -
> >> >> > -TEST_POLICY_DIR                := $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/$(DISTRO_VER)
> >> >> > -
> >> >> > -# load remains for backwards compatibility...
> >> >> > -load:
> >> >> > -       $(MAKE) -C $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)
> >> >> > -else
> >> >> > -
> >> >> >  MAKE_TARGETS           := test_policy.te
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -TEST_POLICY_DIR                := $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/generic
> >> >> > -
> >> >> > -POLICY_FILES           := test_global.te $(filter-out 
> >> >> > test_global.te,$(notdir
> >> >> > $(wildcard $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/*.te)))
> >> >> > -
> >> >> >  ifneq ($(CHECKPOLICY_VERS),24)
> >> >> >  POLICY_FILES           := $(filter-out 
> >> >> > test_bounds.te,$(POLICY_FILES))
> >> >> >  endif
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +# This is being done to preserve precedence; test_global.te must 
> >> >> > come first.
> >> >> > +POLICY_FILES           := test_global.te \
> >> >> > +                          $(filter-out test_global.te,$(notdir 
> >> >> > $(wildcard
> >> >> > $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/*.te)))
> >> >> > +
> >> >> >  load:
> >> >> > -       @if [ -d "$(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR)" ]; then \
> >> >> > -           cp -p $(TEST_POLICY_DIR)/test_policy.* 
> >> >> > $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR); \
> >> >> > +       @set -e; if [ -d "$(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR)" ]; then \
> >> >> > +           cp -p test_policy.* $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR); \
> >> >> >            $(MAKE) -C $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR) clean; \
> >> >> >            $(MAKE) -C $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR) test_policy.pp; \
> >> >> >            $(SEMODULE) -i $(POLICY_DEVEL_DIR)/test_policy.pp; \
> >> >> >        else \
> >> >> > -            echo "ERROR: You must have selinux-policy-devel 
> >> >> > installed."; \
> >> >> > +            echo "ERROR: You must have selinux-policy?-devel? 
> >> >> > installed."; \
> >> >> >            false; \
> >> >> >        fi
> >> >>
> >> >> There's a stray endif on line 90 of refpolicy/Makefile that needs to
> >> >> be deleted as well, FYI...
> >> >
> >> > Ok.  test policy appears to build (on Fedora) when running make by hand
> >> > from the refpolicy directory, but you still can't run the tests, either
> >> > from /opt/ltp or from the source tree.
> >> >
> >> > # cd /opt/ltp/testscripts && ./test_selinux.sh
> >> > Running with security 
> >> > context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> >> > /etc/selinux /opt/ltp
> >> > /opt/ltp
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use --> off
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use exists setting
> >> > building and installing test_policy module...
> >> > ./test_selinux.sh: line 92: cd: 
> >> > /opt/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy: No such 
> >> > file or directory
> >> > make: *** No rule to make target `load'.  Stop.
> >> > Failed to build and load test_policy module, aborting test run.
> >> > /etc/selinux /opt/ltp
> >> > /opt/ltp
> >> >
> >> > # cd LTP_SRCDIR/testscripts && ./test_selinux.sh
> >> > Running with security 
> >> > context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> >> > /etc/selinux /home/sds/ltp
> >> > /home/sds/ltp
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use --> off
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use exists setting
> >> > building and installing test_policy module...
> >> > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/share/selinux/devel'
> >> > rm -fR tmp
> >> > rm -f *.pp
> >> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/selinux/devel'
> >> > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/share/selinux/devel'
> >> > Compiling targeted test_policy module
> >> > /usr/bin/checkmodule:  loading policy configuration from 
> >> > tmp/test_policy.tmp
> >> > /usr/bin/checkmodule:  policy configuration loaded
> >> > /usr/bin/checkmodule:  writing binary representation (version 10) to 
> >> > tmp/test_policy.mod
> >> > Creating targeted test_policy.pp policy package
> >> > rm tmp/test_policy.mod tmp/test_policy.mod.fc
> >> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/selinux/devel'
> >> > Successfully built and loaded test_policy module.
> >> > /etc/selinux 
> >> > /home/sds/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy
> >> > /home/sds/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy
> >> > Running the SELinux testsuite...
> >> > ls: cannot access /home/sds/ltp/testcases/bin: No such file or directory
> >> > /usr/bin/chcon: cannot access `/home/sds/ltp/testcases/bin': No such 
> >> > file or directory
> >> > ./test_selinux.sh: line 119: /home/sds/ltp/bin/ltp-pan: No such file or 
> >> > directory
> >> > /usr/bin/chcon: missing operand
> >> > Try `/usr/bin/chcon --help' for more information.
> >> > Removing test_policy module...
> >> > /usr/sbin/semodule -r test_policy
> >> > rm -f -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/test_policy.* test_policy.te
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use --> off
> >> > allow_domain_fd_use exists setting
> >> > Done.
> >> >
> >> > Both test_selinux.sh and tests/runtest.sh need to be updated.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Stephen Smalley
> >> > National Security Agency
> >>
> >>     Ok, next patch then... Let me know how this goes (I took a quick
> >> look and I didn't see anything suspicious in the test scripts
> >> themselves..).
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Garrett
> >
> > patching file ../../../../testscripts/test_selinux.sh
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 23.
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 57.
> > 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
> > ../../../../testscripts/test_selinux.sh.rej
> >
> > I think it would work better if you just committed all of the patches
> > thus far and I can just re-test cvs head.
> >
> > If you do post any further patches, please make them relative to the top
> > of the tree.
> 
>     Ugh, I hate CVS diffs too (so I understand)... I was trying to
> avoid committing intermediate work, but as long as this gets fixed
> before the next snapshot, I guess that's fine. Committed the next step
> to CVS.

# cd /opt/ltp
# ./testscripts/test_selinux.sh
Running with security 
context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
/etc/selinux /opt/ltp
/opt/ltp
allow_domain_fd_use --> off
allow_domain_fd_use exists setting
building and installing test_policy module...
make: *** No rule to make target `load'.  Stop.
Failed to build and load test_policy module, aborting test run.
/etc/selinux /opt/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy
/opt/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy

There is no Makefile
under /opt/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy,
only in the source tree.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to