> -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:20 AM > To: Mitani > Cc: 'Garrett Cooper'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:58:17 +0900 Mitani wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I suggest new patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomonori Mitani <[email protected]> > > This one is OK with me also, but... > > Is it possible to determine the difference between a kernel that does > not support hugepages at all and a kernel that does support hugepages > but just does not have enough of them allocated? > > or maybe we don't care about this difference. Do we? >
I cannot give a good opinion because I'm not a creator of these test programs, but ... I think that the difference of test refusal reason isn't so important. How about following message? : ------------ Not support Hugepages or not enough available Hugepages ------------ If users read above message, they will examine a reason by themselves and will do appropriate measures (set an enough hugepages value or gave up this test), I think. Regards-- -Tomonori Mitani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
