On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:03:45PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Jul 23, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Nicolas Joly wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:56:58AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Joly <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The attached patch do some cleanup in the abort01 testcase ... > >>> > >>> 1) The attempt to remove the generated core is wrong. The hard-coded > >>> `core' name is bad and the test temporary directory removal already > >>> take care of this. > >>> > >>> 2) Make the test fail gracefully if the running environment does not > >>> allow generating core files. > >>> > >>> nj...@lanfeust [syscalls/abort]> ./abort01 > >>> abort01 1 TPASS : Test passed > >>> nj...@lanfeust [syscalls/abort]> (ulimit -c 0 && ./abort01) > >>> abort01 1 TCONF : core file size limit must be greater than 0. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Joly <[email protected]> > >> > >> Looks ok, but is there any particular reason why you removed the unlink(2) > >> call? > > > > The `unlink("core")' one ? > > > > Well, at least RHEL do use `proc.<pid>' when generating core file > > names ... Not speaking about admins that might have configured it to > > use another scheme. > > > > IMO, relying on a specific name, for a configurable system, is a bad > > idea; and can only lead to problems. > > > > By example, this test from mkdir09.c cannot succeed on most RHEL > > systems: > > > > /* Check for core file in test directory. */ > > if (access("core", 0) == 0) { > > tst_resm(TWARN, "\tCore file found in test directory."); > > tst_exit(); > > } > > Yeah. Perhaps it might be a good idea to integrate a tool into LTP which > detects corefile names, like what's described here: > http://aplawrence.com/Linux/limit_core_files.html .
If there is a real need, why not; but for the current use in syscall testcases, it seems a little overkill. testcases/kernel/syscalls/abort/abort01.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill11.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/mallopt/mallopt01.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid02.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid05.c Remove core files that may have been created during the test ... The temp test directory removal can/do already remove them. testcases/kernel/syscalls/mkdir/mkdir09.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/setrlimit/setrlimit01.c Check that a childs does not have created a core file ... Could be tested from child process status instead. -- Nicolas Joly Biological Software and Databanks. Institut Pasteur, Paris. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
