Hi,

this is my first email to the LTP ML, so I am new and anot not
familiar with known or unknown conventions here.

I am using LTP, to be honest the "lite" test to check my Linux
(upstream) and Linux-Next kernels.
So, having run "runltplite.sh" successfully gives me a 1st impression
or orientation this kernel has no bigger issues.

To be honest I have checked with a minimal kernel-setup (a
localmodconfig-ed setup with some debugging enabled).

While looking trough the results especially searching for some
pattern, I noticed the different spelling of the word "succeeded" VS.
"succeded".
The spell-checker integrated in Firefox v18.0 tells me "succeeded"
with double-e is correct.

[ SUCCEDED - one "E" ]

$ egrep -i 'error|fail'
runltplite-results_3.8.0-rc3-next20130116-2-iniza-generic.txt | egrep
-i succeded
flock01     1  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Shared Lock, returned
error number=0
flock01     2  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Unlock, returned error number=0
flock01     3  TPASS  :  flock() succeded with Exclusive Lock,
returned error number=0

[ SUCCEEDED - double "E" ]

$ egrep -i 'error|fail'
runltplite-results_3.8.0-rc3-next20130116-2-iniza-generic.txt | egrep
-i succeeded
madvise02    5  TFAIL  :  madvise succeeded unexpectedly
open call succeededopen failed with EACCES as expectedopen call
succeeded<<<execution_status>>>

AFAICS flock01.c needs to be corrected:

--- ltp-full-20120903.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock01.c
 2012-09-03 06:39:27.000000000 +0200
+++ ltp-full-20120903/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock01.c
2013-01-16 14:12:36.597859952 +0100
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
                                continue;       /*next loop for MTKERNEL  */
                        } else {
                                tst_resm(TPASS,
-                                        "flock() succeded with %s,
returned error number=%d",
+                                        "flock() succeeded with %s,
returned error number=%d",
                                         test_cases[i].opt, TEST_ERRNO);
                        }

Not sure if you like that patch sent via git-email as a separate patch?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
- Sedat -

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to