Hi! > as said I am knew to LTP. > > Such a typo makes grepping for special search-patterns difficult. > I was searching for real failures by sorting out "expected" and > "succeeded" lines. > Even this is a trivial fix for you - it helped here :-). > > Not sure what you are expecting from me. > Might be I flood ltp-results ML with the results of my Linux-Next kernels. > Unsure if this helps people or not. > > Personally, I don't like the outputs of results... > Especially start/end tags should include the (file)name of the testcase. > But I had no deeper look into the results and only run the "lite" test-script.
Well the whole part of LTP that is used to run testcases is outdated and messy. I've tried to start discussion about possible rewrite/replacement: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30192380 But so far nothing has been done. > Looking into the README file I see I am missing some kernel-configs to > be enabled. > Not sure if I really what to dig that deep into LTP. That most likely means that some tests would return unsupported rather than success/fail. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
