Hi! > > Hi, > > > > looks good to me. I'm assuming the reason for setup/cleanup > > is that you wanted some unrelated child to be present. > > > > Hi, > Thank you for your review and test. :) > As you can see, there has been a test for ECHILD in waitid02.c. That > test for idtype and id (waitid()) does not exist. > In this patch, the process calls fork to get a child, but it waits for > the other process, then ECHILD would return. After the test, calling > cleanup. That test for idtype and id (waitid()) is not a child of the > calling process.
I've modified the commit message to explain why we keep child waiting in the background and pushed, thanks. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
