On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:20 +0200, [email protected] wrote: Hi, > Hi! > > > Hi, > > > > > > looks good to me. I'm assuming the reason for setup/cleanup > > > is that you wanted some unrelated child to be present. > > > > > > > Hi, > > Thank you for your review and test. :) > > As you can see, there has been a test for ECHILD in waitid02.c. That > > test for idtype and id (waitid()) does not exist. > > In this patch, the process calls fork to get a child, but it waits for > > the other process, then ECHILD would return. After the test, calling > > cleanup. That test for idtype and id (waitid()) is not a child of the > > calling process. > > I've modified the commit message to explain why we keep child waiting in > the background and pushed, thanks. >
OK, and thank you very much. Best regards, Zeng ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
