Link aggregation goes by many different names.  Trunking and Etherchannel
are both pretty much the same thing..


----- Original Message -----
From: "Francis Avila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Conrad Lawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"LTSP discussion list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Link aggregation [Was: Colision when using ltsp]


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Conrad Lawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LTSP discussion list"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 19:48
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Link aggregation [Was: Colision when using
ltsp]
> [...]
>
> The problem with this strategy is that most of the link aggregation
> technologies are NIC vendor dependant where NIC drivers and switches would
> communicate using proprietary protocol. The IEEE 802.3ad Port Aggregation
> standard will address this issue.  Also, the link aggregation NIC driver
> software is usually  written  primarily for  NetWare or Windows  network
> operating system.  So you may have to do some research to find a
Linux-based
> solution.
> [end]
>
> What you're referring to is also (I believe) called trunking,
EtherChannel,
> or channel bonding. If this is not the same technology, then it's an
> alternative that does pretty much the same thing, plus works with Linux.
> It's included in all kernels >2.4.12, although you might need to
recompile.
>
> Look at Documentation/networking/bonding.txt in any recent kernel source.
>
> You'll also need a small userspace utility to actually bond the
interfaces,
> but the source for this is also included with the kernel source:
> Documentation/networking/ifenslave.c
>
> There are three different transmission policies:
>
>  Round robin, based on the order of enslaving, the output device
>  is selected base on the next available slave.  Regardless of
>  the source and/or destination of the packet.
>
>  XOR, based on (src hw addr XOR dst hw addr) % slave cnt.  This
>  selects the same slave for each destination hw address.
>
>  Active-backup policy that ensures that one and only one device will
>  transmit at any given moment. Active-backup policy is useful for
>  implementing high availability solutions using two hubs (see
>  section on HA).
>
> If you only want high availability, you don't need any special hardware.
If
> you want load balancing, you will almost certainly need a switch that
> supports bonding. A small, representative list is included in the
> bonding.txt files (in my experience, any mid-range or better switch has
> support for this).  However, bonding is independent of Ethernet drivers.
> You can even mix makes and models of cards in a single channel.
>
>
> Stolen from bonding.txt:
> Resources and links
> ===================
>
> Current developement on this driver is posted to:
>  - http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/bonding/
>
> Donald Becker's Ethernet Drivers and diag programs may be found at :
>  - http://www.scyld.com/network/
>
> You will also find a lot of information regarding Ethernet, NWay, MII,
etc.
> at
> www.scyld.com.
>
> For new versions of the driver, patches for older kernels and the updated
> userspace tools, take a look at Willy Tarreau's site :
>  - http://wtarreau.free.fr/pub/bonding/
>  - http://www-miaif.lip6.fr/willy/pub/bonding/
>
> To get latest informations about Linux Kernel development, please consult
> the Linux Kernel Mailing List Archives at :
>    http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/latest/
>
> --
> Francis Avila
>
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now
https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to