We had lots of trouble building LBE on various systems with 2.6 kernels,
and in every case, it turned out to be the 'gettext' package wasn't
installed on the machine.

Check to make sure you have gettext installed, and see if that clears up
the problem.

Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Jeff Murphy wrote:

> to build LBE under FC3, i temporarily moved /lib/modules/`uname -r`
> out of the way (renamed it) and i also added --disable-sanity-checks
> to the glibc package.def
>
> i havent yet looked into which portion of the build is causing LBE to
> put /lib/modules/`uname -r` into the include path, but the rename hack
> appears to be a quick workaround. don't forget to rename it back after
> LBE finishes building ;)
>
> jeff
>
>
>
> > >>Following errors occurs when i compiles ltsp
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>/lib/modules/2.6.5-1.358/build/include/linux/config.h:6:2: #error
> > >>including kernel header in userspace; use the glibc headers instead!
> > >>make[2]: ***
> > >>[/home/amitvyas/lbe/crosscomp-src/glibc/glibc-build/elf/readlib.o] Error
> > >>1
> > >>make[2]: Leaving directory
> > >>`/home/amitvyas/lbe/crosscomp-src/glibc/glibc-2.3.2/elf'
> > >>make[1]: *** [elf/subdir_lib] Error 2
> > >>make[1]: Leaving directory
> > >>`/home/amitvyas/lbe/crosscomp-src/glibc/glibc-2.3.2'
> > >>make: *** [all] Error 2
> > >>Unable to build glibc
> > >>Unable to build crosscomp-src:
> > >
> > >
> > > I know of no 2.6 system that will build lbe. The was recent discussion
> > > on this list to say 1) Build lbe under redhat 9 2) move the build env to
> > > your 2.6 system to build ltsp-src, kernel, initrd.
> >
> > I have seen this message now several times. It confuses me. I thought
> > maybe people were talking about getting 2.6 built as a kernel to use on
> > the thin clients, but it seems you talk about getting LBE built on a
> > machine that runs 2.6.
> >
> > I have on my system Debian Sarge running 2.6.8-1 as a bog standard
> > Debian kernel:
> >
> > # uname -a
> > Linux hugin 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> > Building LBE was not a problem at all. Since then I have added a couple
> > of packages myself that also build well.
> >
> >
> > # cd /home/projects/lbe
> > # ./build_all
> >
> > <snip>
> > ################################################################################
> > Processing time to run ./build_all :
> >
> >    crosscomp-src           0:04
> >    lbe-src                 0:20
> >    ltsp-src                0:26
> >    kernel-src              0:07
> >                         =======
> >    Total                   0:57
> >
> >
> > I don't recollect doing anything special, and thought this might clear
> > up a misunderstanding.
>
> Thanks lots that IS useful info.
> I assume it really has nothing to do with the kernel, but rather libs,
> includes etc.
>
> lbe will not build under:
> fedora 2
> fedora 3
> suse 9.1
> suse 9.2
>
> James
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to