On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Daniel Mealha Cabrita wrote:
Now it's me who's curious...
I wonder why did you choose segmenting the ethernet at server side with a
couple of [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of using a single 1Gbit card and a switch
with 1-2 gigabit ports? You also wanted a QoS effect?
The load to the upstream side (largely text protocols without
graphic images to make the content 'fat') was much lighter
than the delivery of content to the X-server clients from the
LTSP servers. Gig ethernet was not needed there. Possibly I
should have run the NFS server with a dedicated link to each
LTSP server, in handsight, as that link was the next busiest,
after the links to the clients.
[Tuning the link layout was determined by sampling the
interface statistics]
- Russ Herrold
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
