On Tuesday 10 April 2007 05:52, Jim McQuillan wrote: > Jumako wrote: > > For me it looks like that lp_server is a fork from p910nd (author: Ken > > Yap, see http://www.etherboot.org/p910nd/), but I am not really sure. > > lp_server and p910nd have nothing in common. Other than the fact that > over the years, LTSP has used both. > > lp_server indeed has license problems. I've tried contacting the > author, but I've not received any replies to my queries. > > We're working on a suitable replacement for LTSP-5 that both Ubuntu and > Debian can use. > > Jim McQuillan > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the answer, Jim McQuillan, the reason why I am thinking that it is a fork, Ken Yap wrote on http://www.etherboot.org/p910nd/ : "I haven't really been keeping track but projects that have adopted it include the 3.x versions of LTSP, although for unexplained reasons they renamed the software, ..." So may I stop providing the lp_server binary? I am very happy that you're working on a suitable replacement. Greetings Jumako ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
