> > If you're decided on calling your version number "34-2", then > > unfortunately that numbering is incompatible with LuaRocks, and we'll > > have to rename it to something like "34.2" in order to use "34.2-1" > > for the full version-revision string. The reason for that is because > > we support hyphens in package names, so "stdlib-34-2-1.rockspec" would > > be ambiguous: it currently parses as "stdlib-34" version "2", revision > > "1". > > How about calling it 34a, which is the usual GNU project method of > repackaging A broken previous release? > > if not, then 34.1-1 seems like a decent compromise. >
Consider using SemVer [1] in general? Thijs [1] http://semver.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
