On 30 April 2013 00:01, Sean Conner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the
> ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules. All the Lua modules I've
> written in C use C99 features (some more, some less). I rationalize this
> because
>
> 1. C99 is now fourteen years old
> 2. I started with C89 in 1991! I think I can safely use a standard
> that is fourteen years old by now! [3]
>
> But unfortunately, the supoprt for C99 in Luarocks is ... possible, but it
> still has issues.
I hear you, and C99 support was an unfortunate omission in the
rockspec format. It will certainly be fixed in the future. In the
meantime, there's an ugly gcc-specific hack that works:
defines = { "dummy -std=c99" }
This expands to `-Ddummy -std=c99` in the compilation lines and does
what you expect...
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
