It was thus said that the Great Hisham once stated: > On 30 April 2013 00:01, Sean Conner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the > > ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules. All the Lua modules I've > > written in C use C99 features (some more, some less). I rationalize this > > because > > > > 1. C99 is now fourteen years old > > 2. I started with C89 in 1991! I think I can safely use a standard > > that is fourteen years old by now! [3] > > > > But unfortunately, the supoprt for C99 in Luarocks is ... possible, but it > > still has issues. > > I hear you, and C99 support was an unfortunate omission in the > rockspec format. It will certainly be fixed in the future. In the > meantime, there's an ugly gcc-specific hack that works: > > defines = { "dummy -std=c99" } > > This expands to `-Ddummy -std=c99` in the compilation lines and does > what you expect...
I hate to say that it didn't work. -spc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
