Hi, a sample lua script runs twice slower with texlua of TL2017 than with the texlua from TL2016 and bare lua 5.3.3 I also have on my mac os x 10.9.5
is this expected ? $ time texlua collatz.lua 1 1000000 837799 real 0m39.053s user 0m39.034s sys 0m0.017s $ time lua collatz.lua 1 1000000 837799 real 0m17.004s user 0m16.991s sys 0m0.006s (actually I had gotten about 20s initially ) and: $ time /usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-darwin/texlua collatz.lua 1 1000000 837799 real 0m21.292s user 0m21.271s sys 0m0.012s Thus the TL2017 texlua executes about 2x slower than the TL2016 one I am on mac os x 10.9.5, $ cd `dirname $(which texlua)` && pwd -P /usr/local/texlive/2017/bin/x86_64-darwinlegacy $ lua -v Lua 5.3.3 Copyright (C) 1994-2016 Lua.org, PUC-Rio I also have a $ /usr/local/bin/lua -v Lua 5.2.3 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio $ which -a lua /sw/bin/lua /usr/local/bin/lua but I guess this is irrelevant to texlua. This originates in this answer https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/372669/4686 and I copied the code into collatz.lua, for convenience here it is ---- start of lua script function collatz_count(n, m) local function collatz_next(n) if ( n % 2 == 0 ) then return n / 2 else return 3 * n + 1 end end m = m or 1 if ( n > 1 ) then return collatz_count( collatz_next(n), m + 1 ) else return m end end function collatz_max_range(start, stop, count, len) count = count or 1 len = len or start if start > stop then return len else if collatz_count(start) > count then return collatz_max_range(start+1, stop, collatz_count(start), start) else return collatz_max_range(start+1, stop, count, len) end end end print(collatz_max_range(tonumber(arg[1]),tonumber(arg[2]))) -- code de Henri Menke https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/372669/4686 ---- end of lua script I have observed in other occasions that my mac os x 10.9.5. laptop has a tendency to have worse performances, in proportion, when computation times run into the minute or so, compared to some Linux box I access elsewhere. But here the problem is with comparison of 2016 and 2017 situations and the fact that bare lua 5.3.3 interpreter is faster. Thanks, Jean-François