On 2/9/2018 2:17 PM, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
some more details (before I make a test case)
the glyphs of the real font have an expansion_factor of -10000 (post_linebreak)
and the virtual fonts have an expansion_factor of 0 (so the question is: why).
The PDF also shows the expected differences:
real:
BT
/F11 9.99999 Tf 0.99 0 0 1 28.346 804.543 Tm
[<006d032503710371038e>-252<03fe038e03be037103190848>-252<07e707e807e907ea07eb07ec07ed07ee07ef07e6>]TJ
ET
virtual:
BT
/F13 9.99999 Tf 1 0 0 1 28.346 804.543 Tm
[<006d032503710371038e>-194<03fe038e03be037103190848>-195<07e707e807e907ea07eb07ec07ed07ee07ef07e6>]TJ
ET
(see the difference in the first argument to the Tm and the different kerning)
So I will investigate further where I messed up.
there is a test for the type being virtual .. can you omit that flag?
just pretend it's a real font .. works here (i need to check why that
test is there, it might not be needed in luatex any more)
so no type="virtual"
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
