scott
This is now a very tired subject for me. I could be speaking for
others. The quote from this poster to whom you have responded is very
appropriate: "Least said, soonest mended." It is advice worth
following. I have proposed that we don't address personal issues with
other members. You seem to agree, yet want it to be worded more
strongly, then violate the very policy you seem to agree should be
implemented. I know that you are just responding to others, but, why?
You will not positively influence the opinions of anyone with this.
All who read the list know that a "certain member" has offended you and
vice versa. This is now the past. Rehashing it only keeps this trivial
issue ongoing. I see it as closed. It is, as you agree, not
appropriate to address personal issues in these posts, so let us stop.
There is no need to explain your side; it is most clear. If others say
something wrong or provoking to you on this matter, please just let it
go. We will see the inappropriateness of it and will judge the poster
accordingly. There is so much more to be done with our time than this.
- [luau] Good Guy/Bad Buy Autumn
- Re: [luau] Good Guy/Bad Buy Joe Linux
- Re: [luau] Good Guy/Bad Buy R. Scott Belford
- Re: [luau] Good Guy/Bad Buy Cliff Brown
- [luau] talking smack Charles Lockhart
- Please ignore Re: [luau] talking smack Charles Lockhart
- Re: [luau] talking smack Robert Green
- Re: [luau] talking smack Ronnie T Livingston
- Re: [luau] talking smack Jon Reynolds
- Re: [luau] Good Guy/Bad Buy Jimen Ching