On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:58:33PM -1000, Randall Oshita wrote: > But I was just wondering if port translation is the same as > port redirection. Is it safe to say that the nat daemon does > port translation as well as address.
Maybe. I tried natd 5 years ago. It did what I needed it to do at the time, but I quickly moved to ipf as soon as I had the chance. If you need help with it, contact me offlist. > If so then NAT = NAPT. Wonder why lots of ppl use it in > different context. NAPT? My googling mentions NAPT as a means to translate IPV4 to IPV6. I generally see NAT and masquerading/overloading/PAT referred to collectively as NAT. -Vince