Oh, right I always turn that off, and I also turn off touchpad clicks... which, off topic, needs to be much easier to do.

On 12/15/2013 01:12 PM, brendanperr...@gmail.com wrote:
One problem with offering both is how do we fit it on a cd as not all can boot from usb without plop or from dvd.

Also remember that alt+scrollwheel in lubuntu means switch desktop unless you want to change openbox configuration.


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Dale Visser <dale.vis...@gmail.com <mailto:dale.vis...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Oops... I meant for that to go to the list. Thanks, Israel! :-)

    Sent from my Windows Phone
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Israel <mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>
    Sent: 12/15/2013 11:21 AM
    To: Dale Visser <mailto:dale.vis...@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any page

    You replied only to me...
    It has integrated addblock features, and you can easily turn off
    JavaScript, and manage what cookies are sent/kept, Click to Play,
    HTML5 data that is kept, etc...  It has a lot of nice features
    built in to it. So far I have really enjoyed using it.  Importing
    bookmarks is pretty painless as well.

    On 12/15/2013 08:48 AM, Dale Visser wrote:
    I looked at the Qupzilla homepage, and agree it could be an
    excellent choice for the default browser. I personally use FF for
    the set of extensions I like (esp. NoScript and LastPass), and
    even on Chrome/Chromium like a certain set of extensions. For a
    basic user, though, having a super fast, low-resource, yet
    functional browser like Qupzilla would make for a great default.

    Sent from my Windows Phone
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Israel <mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>
    Sent: 12/15/2013 8:41 AM
    To: lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
    <mailto:lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
    Subject: Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any page

    @Jordan

    I was being excited about QupZilla, not Chromium.
    I think the thing to offer the choice of browsers would be the
    ubiquity installer.  I have never looked at what makes up
    ubiquity, so I have no idea.  I am not even sure what language it
    was written in.

    I don't know what the dev options are for QupZilla, but it might
    end up being a nice browser for day-to-day browsing.  I suppose
    the reality of switching to it at a later date will be if it is
    Actively developed, and has a strong developer community behind
    (i.e. wont disappear overnight), though WebKit itself has a
    strong community of developers, so it should be fair safe, and
    offer a good browsing experience.  Also it would need to be in
    the official repositories to actually be included, and would need
    a lot of testing on a lot of machines.

    I was really just excited to have a Qt browser that is fast and
    has a lot of features to use on old computers when LXQt comes out
    one day in the future (and is fully usable).

@sd you should check out QupZilla, it offers quite a bit. (Alt+Scroll Wheel for horizontal scrolling). Not sure if all the dev options available would suit you, but it allows for WebKit plugins. I just started trying it out, and am pretty impressed
    with it so far.  It is a much nicer alternative to Opera, as
    Opera is closed source/proprietary.



    On 12/14/2013 10:42 PM, Jordan wrote:
    I would hesitate to make Chromium "standard" until the browser
    is demonstrated to be compatible with most popular Chrome
    plug-ins (especially security plugins.) Sure, Chromium might be
    a good alternative for lower spec machines.  Still many lubuntu
    users will end up removing the Chromium package pronto, as I did
    with older lubuntu releases.  Maybe it'd be better to offer
    users a choice between Chromium and FF.  Can this be done
    through the software center?  I don't use the software center,
    so I don't know its possibilities.

    Jordan


    On 12/14/2013 11:29 PM, Israel wrote:
    This is simply amazing.  I think this would make an excellent
    default... but of course I just downloaded it, and configured
    it.  I will have to do some testing to see what all it can
    handle, and how fast everything is.  With LXQt coming soon...
    this would be an excellent addition to the lineup... though I
    just started using it 5 min ago... so this enthusiasm may be
    premature.

    On 12/14/2013 08:12 PM, David Yentzen wrote:
    I have never used Midori with Lubuntu so cannot comment on it.
    FF works well on my Lubuntu machine but I have been using
    QupZilla lately. It is very fast, opening in less than 2 secs
    and page response it also very fast.  It is lightweight with
    minimal plug-ins but does all that I need, you may wish to try
    it out.  There is a ppa for it here:

    https://launchpad.net/~nowrep/+archive/qupzilla
    <https://launchpad.net/%7Enowrep/+archive/qupzilla>

    Regards
    David




    On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Israel <israeld...@gmail.com
    <mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        ubuntu-bug chromium

        should report it just fine.
        I have found Opera runs very fast on my oldest computers,
        though it is
        proprietary.  If you have a REALLY slow computer it makes
        using the
        internet much more plesant, though I would rather it be
        free and open.
        I did a lot of testing of all the web browsers on that
        computer, before
        I gave it to someone.  I tried Chromium, Firefox, Opera,
        Dooble, Midori,
        Seamonkey (well most of the browsers in the repos, except
        Konq) and all
        of them took +5 Seconds to open.  Firefox took about 1
        second less than
        Chromium, and Opera took about 2 seconds, pages also
        responded much
        quicker, than in the others, and if I had a bunch of stuff
        going it
        wouldn't bog down completely.  Midori was also pretty fast
        (for
        navigating), but loaded the same as the others.
        If your computer is REALLY slow I'd suggest tryng it out
        for a more
        pleasant experience.  If not, enjoy Firefox.

        On 12/14/2013 03:06 AM, sd wrote:
        > Hi,
        >
        > since last update of chromium-browser on Lubuntu 13.10
        the CPU usage
        > is very high with any open page:
        >
        > Version 31.0.1650.63 Ubuntu 13.10
        > (31.0.1650.63-0ubuntu0.13.10.1~20131204.1)
        >
        > Task Manager (lxde)
        >
        > Command User CPU% RSS VM-Size
        > chro root 27% 222.0 MB 1.3 GB
        > chromium-browser user 11% 72.1MB 16777216.0 TB
        >
        > Screenshot
        >
        > http://postimg.org/image/i8hiqwuc5/
        > http://s18.postimg.org/i8hiqwuc5/chromium.jpg
        >
        > It just goes higher and higher if you open any more
        pages, until the
        > system does not respond anymore.
        >
        > I know chromium-browser is not the default browser
        anymore, and I am
        > not sure where to report this issue. Firefox is running
        ok, so I am
        > switching to it atm.
        >
        > Regards, p
        >


        --
        Regards


        --
        Lubuntu-users mailing list
        Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
        <mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
        Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
        https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users






-- Regards







-- Regards


-- Regards


    --
    Lubuntu-users mailing list
    Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
    Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
    https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users






--
Regards

-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Reply via email to