I don't feel particularly strongly about this either... I guess I prefer to at least provide docs in XML/HTML format and anything in addition is bonus. (just most people feel more "comfortable" reading that format in my experience...being a shell guy I'd rather read the text...but there are fewer like me or everyone would just run Linux ;-) )
-Andy On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:24, Doug Cutting wrote: > > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:00, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Currently information on how to build Lucene is in the > > > BUILD.txt file [...] Is this inaccurate or inadequate? > > > > Its good. I just think the "for dummies" version is also > > appropriate in addition to not instead of. > > I worry a little about having the same information maintained in two places. > If the build procedure changes, will both get updated in a timely manner? > Maybe, maybe not. Mind you, I don't feel all that strongly about this. > > Doug > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
