Doug Cutting wrote:
  > Like anything else in an all-volunteer operation, it will only
happen if
  > folks volunteer to do it.  Someone needs to take the lead and index
a
  > reference collection with a couple of different Similarity
  > implementations and post the code and the results of various
searches
  > for folks to evaluate.  Chuck?

Although I would like to volunteer for this, I'm unlikely to find the
time to take the lead.  I'm tuning and customizing Lucene as a small
part of developing a new site.  I can continue to share my observations
and recommendations, along with code for new Lucene functionality that
is important to the effort (e.g., DistributingMultiFieldQueryParser and
MaxDisjunctionQuery).  The limited time I have to work on Lucene itself
must be focused on requirements for my site (e.g., achieving intrinsic
score normalization).  If someone else takes the lead on the relevance
benchmark, I'd be happy to contribute my Similarity and query processing
tools and have them compared to the Lucene's current defaults.

Sorry,

Chuck

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:08 AM
  > To: Lucene Developers List
  > Subject: Re: How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems
with
  > Similarity.docFreq() ?
  > 
  > Chuck Williams wrote:
  > > Christoph Goller writes:
  > >   > You may be right. But I am not completely convinced. I think
  > >   > this should be decided based on the proposed benchmark
evaluation.
  > >
  > > Is that still happening?
  > 
  > Like anything else in an all-volunteer operation, it will only
happen if
  > folks volunteer to do it.  Someone needs to take the lead and index
a
  > reference collection with a couple of different Similarity
  > implementations and post the code and the results of various
searches
  > for folks to evaluate.  Chuck?
  > 
  > Doug
  > 
  >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to