Yes, but this part of the point. Lucene is a field-based search engine and its built-in support for taking simple queries and searching across relevant fields is poor. The fact that is requires all terms in all fields is part of the problem. Once that is addressed, another problem is that Lucene does not provide a good mechanis
Chuck Williams V: (415)464-1889 C: (415)846-9018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: hawimanawiz > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 1:44 PM > To: Lucene Developers List > Subject: Re: Scoring benchmark evaluation. Was RE: How to proceed with > Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ? > > On Friday 28 January 2005 17:53, Chuck Williams wrote: > > > I think the baseline should use Lucene's MultiFieldQueryParser to > expand > > the query to search both title and body fields, as this is presumably > > the current "out-of-the-box" solution. > > Please remember that this is kind of buggy in Lucene 1.4: it will > rewrite > AND queries so that all terms are required in *all* fields, which is not > what one wants for title/body searches. > > Regards > Daniel > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
