Dave, are you using MultiFieldQueryParser and DefaultSimilarity for the vanilla implementation?
It's important to know what we are comparing... Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: David Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 3:38 PM > To: Lucene Developers List > Subject: Re: Scoring benchmark evaluation. Was RE: How to proceed with > Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ? > > Daniel Naber wrote: > > > On Friday 28 January 2005 22:45, Chuck Williams wrote: > > > > > >>The fact that is requires all terms in all > >>fields is part of the problem. Once that is addressed, another > problem > >>is that Lucene does not provide a good mechanis > > > > > > That's fixed in CVS, so maybe the CVS version should be used for the > > evaluation. I think it should be robust. > > Hmmm, is it safe to assume I can build the index w/ lucene-1.4.3.jar but > deploy the webapp for searching w/ lucene-1.5-rc1-dev.jar? > > And is the current code supposed to build with so many deprecated > warnings? > > - Dave > > > > > Regards > > Daniel > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
