Some people including me has been reported this issue still not fixed. Please help on this.
2008/11/18 Jason Baumeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There's a patch attached to LUCENENET-106 for 2.3.1 that has never been > committed to the real SVN repository. Does 2.3.1 still need the fix or has > the memory leak been addressed in another fashion and the bug simply hasn't > been updated to reflect that? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > >
