Yes, this bug has arisen with 2.1 and is still there. But as far as I can remember George has some hesitations on this subject
So George, what do you think on applying that patch? DIGY -----Original Message----- From: Jason Baumeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: LUCENENET-106 and Lucene.Net 2.3.1 There's a patch attached to LUCENENET-106 for 2.3.1 that has never been committed to the real SVN repository. Does 2.3.1 still need the fix or has the memory leak been addressed in another fashion and the bug simply hasn't been updated to reflect that? Thanks, Jason
