+1 On 4 May 2010 20:43, Leonardo Azize Martins <laz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi DIGY, > > I think it is a good choice. > I do not know how can I help, but I would like. > > Regards, > Leo > > > > 2010/5/4 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > > > Hi All, > > > > Issues related with lucene.Java 2.9.3 > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314799) > > > > have started to be fixed in > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src > > > > > > > > What should be the next step for Lucene.Net? > > > > Creating a 2.9.2 tag and porting those fixes to current trunk? > > > > > > > > DIGY > > > > >
