> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:17 PM > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: Lucene.Net 2.9.3 > > Hi All, > Issues related with lucene.Java 2.9.3 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314799) > have started to be fixed in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src > > What should be the next step for Lucene.Net? > Creating a 2.9.2 tag and porting those fixes to current trunk? > > DIGY
You can get the latest changes from svn(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src ), port those to .NET and then post them in a JIRA issue. PS: All changes till rev.912409 have been ported to .NET DIGY -----Original Message----- From: Leonardo Azize Martins [mailto:laz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:34 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene.Net 2.9.3 Hi DIGY, Explain me how can I help. Where are the java codes that needs to be ported to .NET? Leo 2010/5/10 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > Hi All, > 2.9.2 tag is created. > > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 3:23 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.3 > > +1 for the tag > > Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:20 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.3 > > Hi All, > > In order to create a 2.9.2 tag, I plan to wait > > till LUCENENET-358 is fixed, > > and > > at least one of the other commiters post a +1 > > > > DIGY > > > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:17 PM > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: Lucene.Net 2.9.3 > > > > Hi All, > > Issues related with lucene.Java 2.9.3 > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314799) > > have started to be fixed in > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src > > > > What should be the next step for Lucene.Net? > > Creating a 2.9.2 tag and porting those fixes to current trunk? > > > > DIGY > > >
