[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931602#action_12931602
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-380:
-------------------------------------------
Alex, are you familiar enough with Sharpen and the ability to do those mappings
to produce the 5 files posted so that we can do some comparisons to determine
if Sharpen or JavaToCSharp is a better way to go?
Also, JavaToCSharp isn't free - so that might be a hinderance because we would
always require someone with that software to continue with releases.
> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: George Aroush
> Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip,
> 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java,
> Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java,
> TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files (which
> are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against
> JLCA result.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
