Something to think about for future use is accessibility of the build server for those maintaining.
How we do go about sharing that information, obviously you don't want to hand out access to the ci server to a public mailing list. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>wrote: > Why do I forget to check against the obvious? Anyhow, I guess we can > run with what we have, though that build is not doing much. Any idea > how we get administrative access over there? Might as well try and get > it to do stuff like run the tests as well. > > I think long-term, we'll need something a bit more custom, at least > for the build slave/build agent angle --- that would be where the > magic largely happens. Such as automated sharpen builds . . . > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:29 AM, digy digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No. It's Rune's work. > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E > > > > < > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E > > > > DIGY > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glyn Darkin <g...@darkinsystems.com > >wrote: > > > >> The guys at code better run a Team City CI which has been building > >> Lucene.Net for a while > >> > >> I believe that DIGY set this up. > >> > >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/login.html > >> > >> Glyn > >> > >> > >> On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> > >> > On 2011-01-26, Wyatt Barnett wrote: > >> > > >> >> 2) CI : oh hells yeah. My vision would be to setup something where > the > >> >> automated conversion would be triggered by commits to the "stable" > >> >> branch of the java project. I think if we can construct this bit > right > >> >> we can even really get down the road of automatically running all the > >> >> conversion options until we get it "right". > >> > > >> > Sounds good. "Back to the mundane" as you said later the ASF runs a > few > >> > options for CI <http://ci.apache.org/>, one of them is Hudson > >> > <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/> which has at least one Windows > slave > >> > installation (Server 2008) and is supposed to support MSBuild. > Buildbot > >> > might work as well. > >> > > >> > I'm not up to speed with the state of xbuild but adding support for it > >> > to Gump (which fills quite a different role from a traditional CI) > >> > wouldn't be too hard and give us builds on Mono - albeit 2.4 right > now, > >> > this could be changed by adding the Mono PPAs to the Ubuntu servers. > >> > > >> > Stefan > >> > >> Glyn Darkin > >> > >> Darkin Systems Ltd > >> Mob: 07961815649 > >> Fax: 08717145065 > >> Web: www.darkinsystems.com > >> > >> Company No: 6173001 > >> VAT No: 906350835 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > -- Michael Herndon Senior Developer (mhern...@o19s.com) 804.767.0083 [connect online] http://www.opensourceconnections.com http://www.amptools.net http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23 http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
