would the accessibility just be a configuration script? I'm not sure how CI is set up, but I assume that we could set up something that points to our repository for that, thus any committer could update the configuration script. Also, I dug a bit into Hudson (I'm not familiar with it), there is MSBuild support (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/MSBuild+Plugin), and looking at the FAQ for Hudson that the apache infrastructure team has it looks like plugin's can be added (http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_install_a_new_Hudson_plugin.3F). This is likely something they had to do for us, but I don't see why it would be an issue for them to do it for us ~Prescott
---------------------------------------- > Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0500 > Subject: Re: Build & CI Considerations > From: mhern...@o19s.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Something to think about for future use is accessibility of the build server > for those maintaining. > > How we do go about sharing that information, obviously you don't want to > hand out access to the ci server to a public mailing list. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Wyatt Barnett wrote: > > > Why do I forget to check against the obvious? Anyhow, I guess we can > > run with what we have, though that build is not doing much. Any idea > > how we get administrative access over there? Might as well try and get > > it to do stuff like run the tests as well. > > > > I think long-term, we'll need something a bit more custom, at least > > for the build slave/build agent angle --- that would be where the > > magic largely happens. Such as automated sharpen builds . . . > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:29 AM, digy digy wrote: > > > No. It's Rune's work. > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E > > > > > > < > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E > > > > > > DIGY > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glyn Darkin > > >wrote: > > > > > >> The guys at code better run a Team City CI which has been building > > >> Lucene.Net for a while > > >> > > >> I believe that DIGY set this up. > > >> > > >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/login.html > > >> > > >> Glyn > > >> > > >> > > >> On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> > > >> > On 2011-01-26, Wyatt Barnett wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> 2) CI : oh hells yeah. My vision would be to setup something where > > the > > >> >> automated conversion would be triggered by commits to the "stable" > > >> >> branch of the java project. I think if we can construct this bit > > right > > >> >> we can even really get down the road of automatically running all the > > >> >> conversion options until we get it "right". > > >> > > > >> > Sounds good. "Back to the mundane" as you said later the ASF runs a > > few > > >> > options for CI , one of them is Hudson > > >> > which has at least one Windows > > slave > > >> > installation (Server 2008) and is supposed to support MSBuild. > > Buildbot > > >> > might work as well. > > >> > > > >> > I'm not up to speed with the state of xbuild but adding support for it > > >> > to Gump (which fills quite a different role from a traditional CI) > > >> > wouldn't be too hard and give us builds on Mono - albeit 2.4 right > > now, > > >> > this could be changed by adding the Mono PPAs to the Ubuntu servers. > > >> > > > >> > Stefan > > >> > > >> Glyn Darkin > > >> > > >> Darkin Systems Ltd > > >> Mob: 07961815649 > > >> Fax: 08717145065 > > >> Web: www.darkinsystems.com > > >> > > >> Company No: 6173001 > > >> VAT No: 906350835 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Michael Herndon > Senior Developer (mhern...@o19s.com) > 804.767.0083 > > [connect online] > http://www.opensourceconnections.com > http://www.amptools.net > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23 > http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net > http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
