Stefan/DIGY, Have either of you gone through the process of making a signed release yourselves? I've been reading over the documentation, and well.. That's a lot of documentation. It's hard to tell how much of this is relevant.
I'd like to get myself set up to to do this but it seems a bit complex. The step by step instructions still left me with questions. I'd like to put together a wiki page of step-by-step set of instructions that are specific to our project. Thanks, Troy On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Prescott, > > I think there is a misunderstanding about the release. In Apache way, a > release is a *signed* binary release(compiled version). > > Lucene.Net.dll has no dependency to other binaries(unless you want to test > or use compression) and they will not be included in the release. > > DIGY > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:04 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: ser...@mirvoda.com > Subject: RE: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ > > > > >> Perhaps that's Prescott's intention with the new vs2010 branch? > > Yes that's the intention. I started to look at what Wyatt did > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377. I think feel that it > works well as designed. > > Question: Wyatt has included the nunit.dll's I know we had a conversation > before about this. But I think being able to pull down everything, open a > single solution which has test, contrib, src, as well as the required > dependancies would be a huge boon to getting people to work on this stuff. > > Every change I need to make for 2.9.2-2.9.5 requires me to touch the tests. > it just makes sense from my perspective to have this all in the same > solution ready to roll. > > Is this something people are open too having in the source control, or > something I should keep to my local? Also, I don't recall the legal stuff > behind including nunit. > > Obviously a release would just be the src rolled up and packaged. > > > > > ---------------------------------------- >> From: thowar...@gmail.com >> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:38:47 -0800 >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> CC: ser...@mirvoda.com >> >> It's a common practice for developers to create a branch to work on a >> new feature, then merge that branch back into trunk later when the >> changes are complete, then delete the branch. >> >> The goal is to ensure that incremental commits, performed now against >> the branch instead of trunk, don't leave trunk in a incompatible, >> unstable or un-buildable state. >> >> Perhaps that's Prescott's intention with the new vs2010 branch? >> >> Thanks, >> Troy >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Sergey Mirvoda wrote: >> > +1 for only one trunk upgraded to VS2010 >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Lombard, Scott > >> wrote: >> > >> >> I agree with DIGY. >> >> >> >> Although why wait until after the official release? >> >> >> >> Scott >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:38 PM >> >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1072121 - > /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> >> >> >> Do we really need a VS2010 branch?. Since there isn't any release since >> >> v2.0 and people have to compile the source by yourselves it has been > good to >> >> support older versions of VS. But after having an offical release, we > could >> >> update the trunk to support VS2010. >> >> >> >> Now for each change in trunk (for v2.9.3, 2.9.4 & 2.9.5) we have to > update >> >> another repository also. >> >> >> >> DIGY >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: pnas...@apache.org [mailto:pnas...@apache.org] >> >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:11 PM >> >> To: lucene-net-comm...@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> >> >> >> Author: pnasser >> >> Date: Fri Feb 18 20:10:54 2011 >> >> New Revision: 1072121 >> >> >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072121&view=rev >> >> Log: (empty) >> >> >> >> Added: >> >> incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> >> - copied from r1069573, incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the >> >> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may >> >> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or >> >> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient >> >> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or >> >> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, >> >> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, >> >> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting >> >> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda >> > = > >
