Scott, I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
Thanks, Troy On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott <slomb...@kingindustries.com> wrote: > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next couple of > days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are we > going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that need to > be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task? > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28 > > All, > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by > unnoticed. > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the > project until the website is updated. > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me', > and perhaps not enough 'we'. > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction, > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that > requires all of us. > > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete > by next Monday are: > > Troy Howard: > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2 > > Sergey Mirvoda: > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion > > Michael Herndon: > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server > > Prescott Nasser: > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current > status and information > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based > > Alex Thompson: > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change > assignments? > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else? > > Thanks, > Troy > > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc. >
