Ok, will add the SharpZipLib ... cool thing of Nuget is that we don't have to add it to our dist.. just add a dependency to the original pkg, so with its own licenses and requirements.
Changes: fixed some texts in the nuspecs, and added the nuspecs for the old pgks. I'll create a JIRA task and attach the changes over there. I'll let you know as soon as I publish the pkgs Simo On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip > > > > > > Looks good > > > > > > > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder > > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed > > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not? > > > > > I would say include it, that way everything works "out of the box". > > > > > > > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone? > > > > > What do you mean changes? I guess you could send them to me, or attach > them to a JIRA > > > > > > Thanks Simone for tackling this > > > > ~Prescott > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:24:28 +0100 > > From: simone.chiare...@gmail.com > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net nuget > > > > So, I created the packages using the binary release available on the > > official site, but using the XML doc I got for building it on my machine. > > > > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip > > > > To test them unzip to file somewhere in your disk, and specify the folder > > as path for Nuget in the package management settings window. > > > > If all is good I'll push them online tomorrow > > > > > > > > I noticed not all contrib projects have been released as binary, so I'm > > including in the contrib pkg only the ones that are part of the binary > > release on the apache site. > > > > I didn't create the sample package with the demo apps because it's just > the > > compiled apps, and not of a create use for those who want to study it. > I'll > > look into making a proper demo pkg in the next weeks. > > > > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder > > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed > > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not? > > > > > > > Finally I needed a logo for the package: > > I used that one > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/branding/logo/lucene-net-icon-128x128.png > > But if would be great if it was also somewhere in the public site. > > For this version I think it's ok to leave it there, but maybe for a next > > release it would be good to publish it in the website. > > > > > > > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone? > > > > Simone > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > > simone.chiare...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > maybe I'm missing something, but looks like the snk file for strongly > > > signing is in the public repo on svn.apache.org > > > > > > Simone > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > > > simone.chiare...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Good... no need to have another key... > > >> Simo > > >> > > >> --- > > >> Simone Chiaretta > > >> @simonech > > >> Sent from a tablet > > >> > > >> On 01/dic/2011, at 21:04, Michael Herndon < > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in the > > >> source > > >> > repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish > > >> malware > > >> > or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored > outside > > >> the > > >> > source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI. > > >> > > > >> > - stored in an ASF private repo. > > >> > > > >> > the a new key probably needs to be generated and stored in the > private > > >> ASF > > >> > repo as well. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > The CI build is at builds.apache.org, however its not complete. > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > > >> simone.chiare...@gmail.com > > >> >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Mine below > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Michael Herndon < > > >> >> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > > >> >>> simone.chiare...@gmail.com > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> You mean a different impersonal Nuget account? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> yes. the goal of the impersonal account was to allow committers to > > >> push > > >> >>> nuget packages in an automated way without the need of having > their > > >> own > > >> >>> account. there was some preliminary work of building nuget > packages > > >> using > > >> >>> the build scripts. > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> Sorry, I haven't followed a lot lately: at the end, did we end up > using > > >> >> teamcity on codebetter or another build system? I remember there > were > > >> >> discussion on that but don't remember how they ended. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> there has been talk on various nuget channels about allowing > nuget to > > >> >> have > > >> >>> --pre tag or having a separate build channel. If you're not > familiar > > >> with > > >> >>> gems/bundler, its basically a way to push packages that are not > > >> official > > >> >>> releases. (nightly, ctp, beta, etc). So in theory the CI could > build > > >> >>> packages nightly if the build does not fail into a channels. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> its also helps from an overall branding perspective. > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> The author that appears on the nuget gallery page can be different > > >> from the > > >> >> owner that puts the package online. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> From what I've seen also used in MS pkgs devs have their in > accounts > > >> >> but > > >> >>>> pkgs have multiple owners. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If its possible to do so link your account as an owner & > prescott's > > >> >> account > > >> >>> with the impersonal one. > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in the > > >> source > > >> >> repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish > > >> malware > > >> >> or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored > outside > > >> the > > >> >> source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI. > > >> >> > > >> >> One last thing: I notice that the official lib is strongly named... > > >> again, > > >> >> not a good idea to have the key checked in the source control. I > guess > > >> now > > >> >> someone owns the key for the strong naming and does the signing > offline > > >> >> from the CI. Is that correct? > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> But if you want we can also go with the Lucene.net team account. > > >> >>>> Simo > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Simone Chiaretta > > >> >> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > > >> >> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > > >> >> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > > >> >> twitter: @simonech > > >> >> > > >> >> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from > magic > > >> >> "Life is short, play hard" > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Simone Chiaretta > > > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > > > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > > > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > > > twitter: @simonech > > > > > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > > > "Life is short, play hard" > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Simone Chiaretta > > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > > twitter: @simonech > > > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > > "Life is short, play hard" > -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber twitter: @simonech Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic "Life is short, play hard"
