We should definitely take some time and clean the code up. With the way the
voting is going in general, it'll be a week for me to beg and plead for the 3
IPMC votes we need to release 2.9.4g - so no rush.. Someone is working on the
CLS issue correct? I want to take another stab at that, but I don't want to
overlap too much. I was thinking of fixing the bit shifting crap I ran into
last time.. ~P
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:30:34 -0800
> From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3
>
> The source that this port was done from was the java release package.
> If you go to the mirrors:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/java/ you'll see that they
> have a 3.0.3 folder with a downloadable source zip. There are
> additional thoughts I wrote down while working on it here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3/trunk/src/core/ChangeNotes.txt,
> but I really need to go through it again and even see if its up to
> date.
>
> 3.0.3's entirety has already been ported to the trunk, except for
> maybe the 7 files listed here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3/trunk/src/core/FileDiffs.txt.
> Contrib has *largely* been ported but is also missing a few
> libraries. There are few unit tests that need to be written for new
> support classes, I think. A lot of code cleanup can be done as well.
> Sorry about the format of this email, kinda just going off the top of
> my head.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Michael Herndon
> <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > Do we have a standard of copy or tag of Java's version source that we're
> > doing a compare against? I only see the 3_1 and above in the tags.
> >
> > I could attempt to do something similar I did with core and version 4 and
> > use beyond compare between 2.9.4 and 3.0.3 and make a list of files that
> > were touched and script out wiki links. Or I could try to generate of
> > beyond compare's diff reports and see how that stacks up and post to the
> > above link.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Prescott Nasser
> > <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I've updated the confluence page to hopefully give us some direction:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene.Net+3.0.3I'd
> >> think it's just easier if as you take down a Java Lucene Issue, you
> >> create a JIRA issue for Lucene.Net and associate it with 3.0.3, rather than
> >> me making a ton of issues. ~P
