Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us. 
Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 that the CMS is based on, which is 
making our commits a pain at the moment. Once that gets upgraded it should be 
relatively smooth sailing. It won't help us though if we want still planning on 
updating massive amounts of documentation on a regular basis.   Thanks Joe, I 
can't thank you enough for the help today.
 ~PrescottDate: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:49:48 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

After some testing it appears that this performancebug is fixed in svn 1.7, but 
the CMS is currentlyrunning 1.6.17.  I hope to have the host upgradedwithin the 
next 30 days or so, but for now I stillrecommend using the script.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:28 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





Alright - sounds good
 
Thanks again!
 
~P
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:25:45 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

I'm having some svn people look at the merge issues.Right now all I can suggest 
is that you publish usingthe publish.pl script on people.apache.org.  It's 
takingme about 10 min total to carry that out, which is certainlytoo long given 
the nature of the changes it's merging,but I'll let you know what I find
 out.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:13 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





It's butt ugly - all in one directory, 8206 files. I'd prefer a more natural 
docs structure, but that's how it gets generated
 
~P
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:10:47 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

Ok lemee kill it and use the publish.pl scripton people to see if I can get it 
to work right.Just curious tho- about how many files do youhave within that 
docs dir- all in one dir I presume?
        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012
 5:08 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





I'm thinking still merge funk
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:05:21 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

Looks like it just completed.  Hmm, goahead and publish and lets try this 
onemore time.

        From: Joe Schaefer
 <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
 To: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:02 PM
 Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   

Yeah more merge funk. Leave it run for now,but don't take any further action 
until youhear from me.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February
 15, 2012 4:59 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





I hate to be the bearer of bad news... still taking days to publish (I'm not 
sure if there is a merge error or not) let me know I'll kill this quick
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:54:52 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

Yeah try out the webgui and edit/commit/publisha minor change.  It should take 
you no more thana minute or so total.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:52 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





Man that sounds like a tool full of awesome!
 
Ok - so for the moment no new docs, a simple edit should be quick?
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:40 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

Ok it's now fixed and your site should work as expectedat this point.  I had to 
redact the lazy_publish featureand reserve it for admins only because you don't 
actuallyhave permission to completely remove your publication
 sitefrom svn and
 that's not something I can offer
 without
 providingyou and every other
 committer with the ability to nukeeach other's entire sites.

   
     From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
 To: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   

Yeah well it's probably timing out somewhere along the line.I'm looking into 
your svn tree now to see if I can figure outwhat's going on.  Basically the svn 
merge it's running isdoing evil things.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To:
 joe_schae...@yahoo.com 

 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:18 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





Sorry, I'm not seeing merge errors, just seeing my browser waiting for a 
response..I'll hold up
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:15:32 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org

Stop Prescott when you get a merge error please.There's something funky going 
on here that I needto dig into and running publish again won't magicallyfix it.

  
      From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:52 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





Ah ok, I thought we were past that part - I'm losing track, just blinding 
taking orders at this point :)
 
~P 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:50:41 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org

Yes as I explained before by using lazy_publishyou will incur a performance hit 
the first timeyou subsequently publish normally.  Once thiscompletes
 things should behave
 properly.

        From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 

 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:48 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





small change still seems to be taking longer than it should..
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:41:20 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org

No a regular publish this time please.

       
 From: Prescott
 Nasser
 <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:39 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
  
 





I started the regular publish - but stopped that, should I do a lazy publish?
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:36:57 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org

Ok that seems to have gone thru cleanly this time.Now please make another minor 
edit to the site andlet's flush things thru one last
 time.

   
     From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
 To: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>; "site-...@apache.org" 
<site-...@apache.org> 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:30 PM
 Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   

I had a bug in lazy_publish- please use that insteadwhen you get an error 
message indicating the mergefailed (like you just did).  I'll keep an eye on 
thingswhile you do.

        From: Prescott Nasser
 <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To:
 joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:49 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





So, that worked, site was all there - looking good.
 
I made a small change to the index.html page (to up the words that it shows 
from the blog roll). And hit publish - I seem to be stuck (taking forever)... 
Not sure why that would occur?
 

 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:31:02 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com

Seems to have
 worked,
 no?
   
     From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:11 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





Here's goes..
 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:56:11 -0800
From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
To: geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org

Try https://cms.apache.org/lucene.net/lazy_publish
Quick and dirty if it works ;-)

  
   
   From: Prescott Nasser
 <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
 To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:27 PM
 Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
   





I'm sorry :( Please by all means take a stab - I'll do nothing until I hear  
back.
 
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:24:46 -0800
> From: joe_schae...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
> To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; geobmx...@hotmail.com; site-...@apache.org
> 
> Well I watched your attempt to publish the site and you guys
> have managed to break svn merge with too many adds/deletes
> of the same paths within a single merge session.  I suggest
> you let me fix your site by nuking the publication tree
> and copying things over from staging.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
 Joe Schaefer
 <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
> > To:
 Prescott Nasser
 <geobmx...@hotmail.com>;
 "site-...@apache.org"
 <site-...@apache.org>
> >
 Cc: 
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> ________________________________
> >>  From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
> >> To: joe_schae...@yahoo.com; site-...@apache.org 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:58 AM
> >> Subject: RE: trouble getting cms content to work correctly
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Thanks Joe, I really appreciate your help.
> >> 
> >> My next task was to tackle that doc issue. I was experimenting with the 
> > upload a
> >> tarball option hoping that would reduce the number of files in the repo, 
> >> but 
> > I
> >> found out all it does is unpack it for me, saves me some bandwidth, but 
> >> does 
> >
 nothing
> >> to save the tree.
> >>  
> >> A couple of weeks ago, I was making no changes to the docs (and there were 
> > no pending changes that I saw), and just making a minor change to the index 
> > page 
> > (to announce a new version of Lucene.Net) took FOREVER - same timeout 
> > issues. 
> > This lead me to believe, that regardless of the size of the change, the 
> > number 
> > of files will always be a PIA. But it seems like that shouldn't be the case?
> > 
> > 
> > Hard to say what the cause of that delay was, but I can assure you it had 
> > little 
> > or nothing
> > to do with the overall size of your site.  The only O(N) algorithm involved 
> > is 
> > when the build
> > system svn up's the tree, and if the changes are already present that 
> > process shouldn't take
> > more
 than a handful of seconds even for a 10GB site.  Of course the actual time 
> > may fluctuate
> > wildly due to server conditions on the cms or svn host systems, but there 
> > you 
> > go.
> > 
> > 
> > I just added some docs about this to the bottom of the 
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref page
> > you might want to look over.
> > 
> > 
> >>  
> >> I will publish what we have now (need to fix a minor issue in the 2.9.4 
> > documentation first), and give a shot at making a minor change. Hopefully 
> > publishing just a minor change in that case will be quick and painless.
> > 
> > 
> > Good luck.  I suggest using the publish.pl script on people.apache.org and 
> > grabbing a cuppa
 coffee
> >
 while things progress.
> > 
                                          


                                          


                                          


      

                                          


                                          


                                          


                                          


      

                                          


                                          


      

                                          


                                          


                                          


                                          

Reply via email to