On 2012-02-15, Christopher Currens wrote: > That's similar to a suggestion Stefan made in another email:
>> The only alternative would be [...] running a >> dynamic server on a dedicated VM. The later would >> be easier to negotiate for a top level project. > Though, his response seems to imply that it would need to stay hosted on > Apache servers? That's not what I meant. It's more an "if it stays on Apache infrastructure then ...". Personally I'd prefer to keep our stuff together in a single place, but there is no hard requirement. Stefan
