I'm going to try and review some of them - looking at the 3.5 ticket atm. The
code should be in compliance with 3.0.3. We might want to do some spot checking
various parts of the code. I'm not sure about the tests. Also, we should
probably run some code coverage tools to see how much coverage we have.
~P
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:37:12 +0300
> Subject: Re: Releasing 3.0.3
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Ok, and is the code in 100% compliance with the 3.0.3 Java code?
>
> I'll be spending some time on fixing the index corruption issue, and it is
> probably best for Chris to wrap up the work he has started
>
> Anyone else on board to close some tickets?
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > Agreed -
> > JIRA for 3.0.3
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316215#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
> > We should evaluate all of these - fix them, mark as won't fix, or move
> > them to another release version. I think the biggest hold up currently is:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484. Chris has made a
> > huge dent, but there are two test cases that are still listed as failing (I
> > can't even duplicate those failures to know where to start)
> > Also we should look at all the other jira tickets and make updates where
> > appropriate
> > ~P
> > > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:21:04 +0300
> > > Subject: Releasing 3.0.3
> > > From: ita...@code972.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > > Where do we stand with this?
> > >
> > > I want to push to a 3.0.3 release, what items are still pending?
> > >
> > > Itamar.
> >
> >
