Just tried to use Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED, and it did not have any effect.
Thomas -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Thomas Skovsende Sendt: 20. september 2007 09:49 Emne: SV: Problem indexing isbn Just triple checked - yes, it does get indexed as a seperate field With Field.Index.TOKENIZED set... Just a thought - should I try using UN_TOKENIZED instead? But as far as I can tell it shouldn't really matter when using standard analyzer. Thomas -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 20. september 2007 09:36 Emne: Re: Problem indexing isbn Jokin: I don't agree , StandardAnalyser doesn't break xx-xx-xx , but keeps it as is. Try Luke to have a look ( rhyming unintentional :) , tab Plugin shows that. ) Thomas: If ISBN is a separate Lucene field ( you don't concat database fields for searching ) , are you sure it is either default or you explicitly use field name when searching. Regards Michael On 9/20/07, Jokin Cuadrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > standardAnalyzer will break the isbn at the "-" characters. I think > the best option in this case is to use a keyword analizer that will > index the field without analyzing it. > > regards > Jokin > > On 9/20/07, Thomas Skovsende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey guys. > > > > I have searched around abit, and I havent really found a solution to > > my problem, so I'm gonna try here. > > > > I am trying to index an ISBN number using a StandardAnalyzer, but i > > get absolutely no hits when I try to search on that ISBN number. > > Every other search I do works perfectly, so I know that everything > > is set up correctly. > > > > I have tried to look at the code for the StandardTokenizer and as > > far as I can see, it should be able to index ISBN's. > > > > I feel pretty sure this is just another case of "stupid developer", > > so if anyone have any pointers or hints, they would be appriciated. > > > > Best regards, > > Thomas Skovsende > > >
