Have you tried to compile using monodevelop? i have done some time ago and work smoothly.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:09 PM, László Monda <l...@monda.hu> wrote: > For those of you who have any doubts about Mono I must say that it > works perfectly well. It's getting more and more popular, it's rock > stable and it even outperforms MS .NET in some areas. There are a > number of big and popular projects that are using it right now. I > don't wanna make a debate about it, just want to make things clear. > > Command line compilation might seem unusual and there are other ways > even on Linux, but it always worked well for me. The current SVN > trunk might be 2.3.1 or anything else, but it's clearly broken right > now. It's not that I've included some files that I shouldn't have > been, but there are some required files (like DocumentWriter.cs) that > are clearly broken. > > I'd really appreciate if developers could tag the appropriate versions > so that one could check out the preferred version and build it without > errors. > > I hope that someone can help me to build Lucene.Net because otherwise > I'll have to port my little application to Java to use Java Lucene > which I wouldn't prefer since I really love the .NET platform. > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Laimonas Simutis <lai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ciaran Roarty <ciaran.roa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So that could be built on Windows and used with Mono? > > > > Would not recommend doing that. I have seen it work, but more than > > often, at least for my projects, I was getting mysterious crashes that > > would go away after recompiling with mono. > > > > I personally haven't tried compiling lucene.net with mono, and cannot > > try it right now, but could give it a shot later on in the evening... > > > > > > > >> > >> On 17 Feb 2009, at 17:26, Laimonas Simutis <lai...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:02 AM, DIGY <d...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Current version of Lucene.Net in svn-trunk (2.3.1) is stable and can > be > >>>> compiled without any error. > >>>> Use project/solution file to compile the project. I personally use > Visual > >>>> C# 2005 Express Edition. You will get thousands of warnings about > unused > >>>> variables or XML documentation but it is OK. > >>> > >>> Yeah, but it looks like he is using mono c# compiler, which basically > >>> tries to build all .cs files in the directory (I think). Maybe there > >>> are some left over, undeleted files hanging around in directories that > >>> are not part of VS IDE project file. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> DIGY > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: László Monda [mailto:l...@monda.hu] > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:53 PM > >>>> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > >>>> Subject: Building Lucene.Net from SVN > >>>> > >>>> I've checked out the latest revision lately, then tried to build > >>>> Lucene by using the following command: > >>>> > >>>> $ gmcs -t:library -r:System.Configuration `find Lucene.Net -name > >>>> '*.cs' ! -name RemoteSearchable.cs -type f` -out:Lucene.Net.dll > >>>> > >>>> Here is what I got: > >>>> > >>>> Lucene.Net/Analysis/Standard/TokenMgrError.cs(49,18): error CS8025: > >>>> Parsing error > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(126,57): error CS8025: Parsing > error > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentReade-2r.cs(32,22): error CS0101: The > >>>> namespace `Lucene.Net.Index' already contains a definition for > >>>> `SegmentReader' > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentReader.cs(34,22): (Location of the symbol > >>>> related to previous error) > >>>> Compilation failed: 3 error(s), 0 warnings > >>>> > >>>> I removed SegmentReade-2r.cs, fixed the messed up comments in > >>>> TokenMgrError.cs and DocumentWriter.cs and tried again. Here's the > >>>> result: > >>>> > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(109,41): warning CS1717: Assignment > >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(116,41): warning CS1717: Assignment > >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(123,41): warning CS1717: Assignment > >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(130,41): warning CS1717: Assignment > >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(137,41): warning CS1717: Assignment > >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(83,55): warning CS0219: The variable > >>>> `cal' is assigned but its value is never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(290,55): warning CS0219: The variable > >>>> `cal' is assigned but its value is never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(65,49): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(75,67): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(79,60): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(83,49): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(114,66): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs(337,91): warning CS0168: The variable > >>>> `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs(534,54): warning CS0219: The variable > >>>> `generatedAux' is assigned but its value is never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FilterManager.cs(270,92): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FieldCacheImpl.cs(482,87): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `nfe3' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FieldCacheImpl.cs(475,79): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `nfe1' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/ParallelMultiSearcher.cs(101,84): warning CS0168: > >>>> The variable `ie' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/ParallelMultiSearcher.cs(153,84): warning CS0168: > >>>> The variable `ie' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/Function/DocValues.cs(143,72): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(401,54): warning CS0168: The variable > >>>> `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(660,102): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `err2' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(673,116): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiReader.cs(182,86): warning CS0168: The variable > >>>> `ignore' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(393,82): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `OpenDocument' and no extension method `OpenDocument' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(395,74): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `OpenField' and no extension method `OpenField' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(399,74): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `CloseField' and no extension method `CloseField' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(402,90): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `IsFieldOpen' and no extension method `IsFieldOpen' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(404,66): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `AddTerm' and no extension method `AddTerm' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(408,58): error CS1061: Type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for > >>>> `CloseDocument' and no extension method `CloseDocument' of type > >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing a > >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/IndexFileDeleter.cs(177,96): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/IndexFileDeleter.cs(221,62): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiSegmentReader.cs(61,78): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `ignore' is declared but never used > >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiSegmentReader.cs(161,94): warning CS0168: The > >>>> variable `ignore' is declared but never used > >>>> Compilation failed: 6 error(s), 28 warnings > >>>> > >>>> I don't wanna hack Lucene just to build it and I cannot use the latest > >>>> build because it is 14 months old and works horribly slowly. I'm > >>>> extremely disappointed about the current state of Lucene.Net. > >>>> > >>>> Anybody has any suggestion how to build Lucene.Net from the SVN? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ron Grabowski < > rongrabow...@yahoo.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> What version of Lucene.net are you using? I found that when I built > the > >>>>> latest version from source the index building was blazingly fast > compared to > >>>>> the latest binaries on the website. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>> From: László Monda <l...@monda.hu> > >>>>> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:18:35 PM > >>>>> Subject: IndexWriter.AddDocument is slow > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi List, > >>>>> > >>>>> It takes pretty long time to index documents using Lucene.Net. It > >>>>> takes about 3 seconds to add thounsand documents to the index. I've > >>>>> used Java Lucene in the past and according to my memories indexing > >>>>> should be about 20 times faster. > >>>>> > >>>>> Here's the relevant code: > >>>>> > >>>>> IndexWriter index_writer = new IndexWriter("index", new > >>>>> StandardAnalyzer(), true); > >>>>> // index_writer.SetMergeFactor(10000); > >>>>> // index_writer.SetMaxMergeDocs(10000); > >>>>> // index_writer.SetMaxBufferedDocs(10000); > >>>>> ExecuteSqlQuery("SELECT artist, title FROM songname"); > >>>>> int count = 0; > >>>>> while (reader.Read()) { > >>>>> if (count > 0 && count%1000 == 0) { > >>>>> Console.WriteLine(count); > >>>>> } > >>>>> Document document = new Document(); > >>>>> document.Add(new Field("artist", > >>>>> reader.GetString("artist"), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); > >>>>> document.Add(new Field("title", > >>>>> reader.GetString("title"), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); > >>>>> index_writer.AddDocument(document); > >>>>> count++; > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>>>> When decommenting the commented lines indexing gets about 2x faster, > >>>>> but it's not really significant. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd really appreciate your insights about this speed issue. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks in advance! > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Laci <http://monda.hu> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Laci <http://monda.hu> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > -- > Laci <http://monda.hu> > -- Jokin
